Originally posted by kerazeesicko
Originally posted by Misterlondon
seriously mate... sit back and look at what you are writing... in every post you make your point is complete nonsense..
just wild theories.. YOU have come up with and nothing to back it up..
why dont you put your effort and time and of course your supreme intelligence into a well researched, informative thread.. this whole thing is
Umm..isn't that what the UFO believers have is theories and nothing more. The OP might be correct..since there is no evidence that earth is being
visited by aliens...stories about them don't count as evidence...you know why..because they could BS..ie I saw Jesus yesterday. Lights or objects in
the sky do not count as Alien aircraft..since there is no proof as to what they are...also...ancient aliens bunk...you have people who have no degrees
in archeology telling us what they interpret in ancient art..etc...that does not count as evidence. We all know that alien abductions are a complete
waste of time since there is no proof of these things happening but the words of the so-called abductees.
So tell me people where is the evidence that absolutely without a shadow of a doubt proves that aliens beings have been to earth and are stilling
visiting us. Show us the science...the artifacts that have been analyzed by top universities...the left over remnants of ancient alien technology that
has been left in from our past...etc. You cannot..because there is nothing that helps your cause..nothing not one tiny shred of evidence.
I agree with you that anecdotal stories and lights in the sky are not proof of Aliens visiting earth but they can still be considered evidence. We
can never say that the craft seen is Alien, unless we get to see who's driving!
The difference between proof and evidence is important though, there is plenty of evidence to suggest we have been visited but I agree this is not
. Evidence needs to be examined in order to judge how reliable it is. Some of it (OK alot
) turns out to be utter nonsense (ie shaky
you tube videos) and then some of it is much more reliable.
Cases such as the foo fighters in WW1, Rendlesham forest incident and the Belgian triangle case are very compelling ones especially considering the
fact that police, airforce etc where involved and knew that these craft where not theirs and far beyond any of our technology in terms of
Your assertion that 'We all know that alien abductions are a complete waste of time since there is no proof of these things happening but the words
of the so-called abductees.' is a misguided one. The Harvard professor John E. Mack spent ten years investigating 'abductions' and concluded that
the nature of these experiences were not physical - hence no or little physical evidence but were no way insignificant in the lives of the people that
Have you ever considered that some of the 'ET's' might actually be beings that exist in other dimensions and have mastered the ability to cross
over into ours and sometimes take us with them? Human beings can only experience a tiny percent ( 10 I think) of the universe with our 5 senses. Just
because an experience is not physical doesn't make it any less 'real' in the opinions of people like John Mack and myself too. There may be a day
when science starts to reveal whats hidden in the other 90% of the universe. Some abductees will feel that they already know about what lurks there,
having experienced it for themselves.
This also fits with the question of why would Aliens bother travelling so far to get to earth. Well why presume they have travelled so far? There
are many more possibilities here,
1) The 'Aliens' might not be from space but another dimensional reality. Crossing between dimensions or frequency is not interstellar travel
2) They may have bases near or on earth therefore eliminating the need for interstellar travel. This is something that we have embarked on with our
attempts at space travel.
3) The craft and 'ET's' we see may just be scouts, like the machines we have sent to mars and other places, which means the ET's may not actually
be here themselves.
4) A far advanced race has probably mastered other technology which eliminates the need for interstellar travel.
So whilst I agree evidence is not proof, a blanket statement of 'we have never been contacted' is rash to say the least. There is
compelling evidence out there if you can be bothered to sift through the bad stuff.