It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It's not their job to be able to explain every ufo case ever. They don't owe you that. And to stress the point, they're called UNIDENTIFIED for a reason.
Giving an alternative theory is'nt debunking. Im yet to hear a solid argument from a scientist as to what some UFO cases are.
There is no crop circle to date that couldn't be man made. All the original ones were, mostly by just two men.
Then theres crop circles
It's perfectly possible for there to be a natural explanation that isn't fully understood - ball lightning and earthquake lights come to mind.
Why? If theres a perfectly natural explanation then show us.
No, scientists aren't convinced yet that the unidentified objects must be - at least in part - of extraterrestrial origin. Again, they're unidentified. For all you know, they could be angels or demons as some religious people point out. OR they are an intelligent species but they actually come from under the seas and oceans as the USOs would indicate - it's more likely than them coming from other planets.
Yet scientists wont accept that theres anything starnge going on because again it challenges what they think they already know.
Being a professor doesn't make you a scientist either. However, in virtually all cases, were undeniable, tangible evidence, like the recovery of an alien craft or them landing on the white house lawn, professors and scientists alike would change their minds. Unlike you lot, though. No number of natural explanations could convince you that there are no aliens visiting us. No amount of debunking or declassifications would convince you. That's pretty much the definition of close-minded.
Being a professor does'nt automaticly make you an expert on everything.
Originally posted by KrypticCriminal
You assume that if aliens want to visit us then they must be intelligent. Your right. But what does it have to do with whether they've contacted us or not, or intelligently chose not to, or have in ways that scientists refuse to acknowlege because it goes against everything they think they know.
Many orthodox people speak as though it were the business of sceptics to disprove received dogmas rather than of dogmatists to prove them. This is, of course, a mistake. If I were to suggest that between the Earth and Mars there is a china teapot revolving about the sun in an elliptical orbit, nobody would be able to disprove my assertion provided I were careful to add that the teapot is too small to be revealed even by our most powerful telescopes. But if I were to go on to say that, since my assertion cannot be disproved, it is intolerable presumption on the part of human reason to doubt it, I should rightly be thought to be talking nonsense. If, however, the existence of such a teapot were affirmed in ancient books, taught as the sacred truth every Sunday, and instilled into the minds of children at school, hesitation to believe in its existence would become a mark of eccentricity and entitle the doubter to the attentions of the psychiatrist in an enlightened age or of the Inquisitor in an earlier time
[Wiki]
It's not their job to be able to explain every ufo case ever. They don't owe you that. And to stress the point, they're called UNIDENTIFIED for a reason.
There is no crop circle to date that couldn't be man made. All the original ones were, mostly by just two men
It's perfectly possible for there to be a natural explanation that isn't fully understood - ball lightning and earthquake lights come to mind.
Being a professor doesn't make you a scientist either. However, in virtually all cases, were undeniable, tangible evidence, like the recovery of an alien craft or them landing on the white house lawn, professors and scientists alike would change their minds. Unlike you lot, though. No number of natural explanations could convince you that there are no aliens visiting us. No amount of debunking or declassifications would convince you. That's pretty much the definition of close-minded.
Originally posted by GeeGee
Firstly, I didn't say that at all. I don't believe an alien craft crashed at Roswell. There's no hard evidence that aliens crashed there. I don't even know where you got that from.
I was talking about your argument that the alleged greys look a certain way contrary to our forecasts of future technology that enables individuals to transcend biology. I'm simply pointing out that it is incorrect in assuming that an alien race is biological simply because they appear to be. It may just be that they look biological, but are actually mechanical or heavily augmented. We wouldn't know unless we had one on an examination table.
but the point is that, that argument doesn't matter because they don't know about us. So if they've come now, that's enormously coincidental. My question to those are convinced that we're being visited, why isn't this evidence good enough to be put into the local science museum? The answers are always that there is good evidence but it's being covered up, well that's an argument from ignorance. That's saying i've got a cure for cancer but they've taken it away from me and locked it up so i can't tell you…..that shouldn't convince you.
My point is that its no one's responsibility to explain any ufo case to the satisfaction of the believer making the fact that some aren't explained or even inexplicable is entirely besides the point.
At what point have i declared that they are identified. So whats your point?
There's no level of complexity in a crop circle that makes its impossible or even unlikely that it was man made. Even a fractal crop circle is well in our ability.
I will however post this vid which may change your mind if you can be bothered to watch it.
So has Hoaxing.
As for the two hoaxers, crop circles have been around for a lot longer than they have.
They have been but its very early days yet. Up until recently scientists didn't believe either ball lightning or earthquake lights definitely existed until they were photographed.
So why dont scientists do what they do best? Look in to the phenomenon and work out whats going on.
Not their responsibility to. It's yours to convince us, that's the burden of proof.
No scientist or debunker has ever convinced me there definatley not.
Look into what?! UFO sightings? Stories of alien abductions? Crop circles? None of these things have been shown to necessarily have anything but natural explanations. The few scientists who actually see any point in trying to find the tell tail signs - since not all scientists are astrobiologists and cosmologists - have committed their time to finding evidence of extraterrestrials; SETI and the scientists behind the Mars rovers spring immediately to mind.
How can they change their minds on something if they wont even look in to it.
And as I've said explicitly in this thread multiple times (as well as in my signature), having a lack of an explanation for something doesn't mean anything. You cannot draw any conclusions from a lack of an explanation. For any case which is unexplained - practically the definition of UFO - the true explanation could be ANYTHING, so to jump to any conclusion is just taking stabs in the dark.
Theres certain cases were the explanations put forward just are'nt good enough.
"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories instead of theories to suit facts." - Sherlock Holmes: A Scandal in Bohemia
1, Aliens wouldn't know we're here unless they either searched for us or received our broadcasts. They've had 3.3 billion years to come here to intently discover life on earth, but just happened to come now when we invent photo's so we can fake them. If they received our broadcasts maybe they're here now but out of the 2000 stars that have been exposed to our signals, that's too small a number to just happen to have intelligent aliens on them.
My point is that its no one's responsibility to explain any ufo case to the satisfaction of the believer making the fact that some aren't explained or even inexplicable is entirely besides the point
There's no level of complexity in a crop circle that makes its impossible or even unlikely that it was man made. Even a fractal crop circle is well in our ability.
So has Hoaxing.
Not their responsibility to. It's yours to convince us, that's the burden of proof.
These other phenomena aren't compelling to someone to approaches the world with the scientific method rather than faith.
And as I've said explicitly in this thread multiple times (as well as in my signature), having a lack of an explanation for something doesn't mean anything. You cannot draw any conclusions from a lack of an explanation. For any case which is unexplained - practically the definition of UFO - the true explanation could be ANYTHING, so to jump to any conclusion is just taking stabs in the dark.
So why are you bringing it up.
If you had of watched the vid you would know that.
Well maybe they should be, if people are going to jump to science to disprove those that do find it compelling.
Try telling this to the OP.
reply to post by Welfhard
That therefore your point is irrelevant
So explain to me exactly what it is about crop circles that means that some of them can't be man made
Why? He didn't say anything wrong as far as I can tell.
Giving an alternative theory is'nt debunking. Im yet to hear a solid argument from a scientist as to what some UFO cases are.
If you want to know what i mean watch the vid.
Go back and read them. I'll let you decide.
Originally posted by andre18
Haven't you ever researched ancient alien theories? They were coming here long before the 1950s, your argument is weak.
Not at all, there's no logical motive aliens would visit us unless we contacted them first.
I can't watch youtube videos.
He said there's nothing to be disclosed because there's no Aliens here because there's no reason there could be, or at least the chances that they are by pure coincidence is negligible.
Originally posted by Welfhard
reply to post by KrypticCriminal
Some of us have to make do with dialup.
He's right in that there's nothing to disclose because no aliens have come here because there's no reason they would have.
Originally posted by Welfhard
reply to post by KrypticCriminal
Some of us have to make do with dialup.
He's right in that there's nothing to disclose because no aliens have come here because there's no reason they would have.
There is no crop circle to date that couldn't be man made. All the original ones were, mostly by just two men.