It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


All evolutionists believe in young Earth.

page: 2
<< 1   >>

log in


posted on Apr, 17 2011 @ 02:29 PM
reply to post by the2ofusr1

You see this confirms my suspicion. You ask another question of me, a brick layer and it is a tactic. You avoid the original statement 'no new stars'.

I have not got the trainining to teach, it appears you do not have an open mind because you question me instead of questioning your beliefs.

All other responses also ask questions of me but avoid the thread topic.

You start telling me how you can back up this claim and I will do my best to debate this.

My guess is you have nothing and so will avoid it. So come on. ' there are no new stars'. Discuss if you dare

BTW (forget the name, original reponse) I am not great at using this forum so I understand but you can at least leave a space between what you are quoteing (me) and you are responding with you as I am also old

BTW this reply is not directected at one reponder but all those that have replied with a question.

the2ofusr1 Actually sorry I see the joke now. Yep if you ignore the bloke that the bible never said died, death is th only 100% theory that I actually intend to prove wrong

edit on 17-4-2011 by colin42 because: Format

edit on 17-4-2011 by colin42 because: clarifaction

edit on 17-4-2011 by colin42 because: Calmed down

posted on Apr, 17 2011 @ 05:27 PM
reply to post by colin42
This is a forum where people make comments .explain statements .ask questions ,and become suspicious . my original response to the linked article you provided carried with it a statement that they thought stars were formed one way but because of what they observed they had to change how they thought stars were formed . I searched to see if there was any fact to stars being formed and found nothing . only theory that postulates that stars are formed naturally .

my question about the 100% certainly of death did not raise your suspicions but may have added to your certainty of your suspension . my tactic as you suppose was to enquire if you actually believed the article you posted to counter the ops statement ...I read the original op and could not understand what he was trying to say . I never intended to prove you wrong about anything least of all life or death...I believe we all have to deal with that ourselves . peace ps.I read your post on the war and gave you a S&F ..nice piece and well thought out.

new topics
<< 1   >>

log in