It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Time Traveller Caught On 1928 Charlie Chaplin Film? dissapears..

page: 1
6
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 15 2011 @ 07:39 PM
link   
Yes, i did search ATS first and found this was posted before ' although ' i also found the first few comments to personally take no interest to the supposed cell phone and immediately the rest of the viewers proceeded to follow suit.

However..in this video, not only does this woman appear to have a speaking device, but she .... ' dissapears ' while she takes notice of the camera.

this may be in the wrong forum for which i apologize, but to be fair..who knows, she could be beaming aboard a ship

www.disclose.tv...



edit on 15-4-2011 by steven704 because: (no reason given)




posted on Apr, 15 2011 @ 07:49 PM
link   
just a very odd video. when i first checked it out it did look like a cell phone device of some kind.. to me looks like she is holding a old fashion hearing aid that people used back then. i think camera just pans out i don't think she disappears... but that would be cool if that is a time traveler



posted on Apr, 15 2011 @ 07:51 PM
link   
reply to post by steven704
 


I for one am a believer that eventually time travel could be possible someday. I just dont know about that clip. It just looks like it is a fade out into a new scene that makes the person disappear. Also I would really like to think that if someone really perfected time travel that they would pick a better place to do it than a 1928 silent film as an extra. Just my opinion. Interested to see what others say.



posted on Apr, 15 2011 @ 07:52 PM
link   
What the...... I don´t have words for this. Very interesting and S+F for sharing.

I have no freakin clue what the device could be and he or she is clearly talking to somebody. Just wow...



posted on Apr, 15 2011 @ 07:53 PM
link   
reply to post by steven704
 


Yeah, and the zebra turns into an elephant. The frame changes....she doesn't vanish. I think this is a bit of a stretch. I'm as fascinated as the next guy with this footage, but.....C"MON



posted on Apr, 15 2011 @ 07:55 PM
link   
She doesn't vanish, and she's holding a hearing aid:

beckerexhibits.wustl.edu...


Acousticon Model 28, 1927
This hearing aid is typical of early electrical hearing aids. It was large and not easily transportable – the batteries were cumbersome and the carbon components were highly sensitive to heat and cold.

Would explain the heavy steps.
edit on 15/4/11 by AdamsMurmur because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 15 2011 @ 07:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by lcbjr1979
reply to post by steven704
 


I for one am a believer that eventually time travel could be possible someday. I just dont know about that clip. It just looks like it is a fade out into a new scene that makes the person disappear. Also I would really like to think that if someone really perfected time travel that they would pick a better place to do it than a 1928 silent film as an extra. Just my opinion. Interested to see what others say.


Would you not visit a Charlie Chaplin film set to see him live or maybe the person was on a mission to prevent something from happening? There are endless possibilities.



posted on Apr, 15 2011 @ 07:56 PM
link   
This came up last year and it was concluded that the person had an early hearing aid device which is about the same size as todays cellphones.



posted on Apr, 15 2011 @ 07:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by AdamsMurmur
She doesn't vanish, and she's holding a hearing aid:

beckerexhibits.wustl.edu...


And why is the person talking?



posted on Apr, 15 2011 @ 07:58 PM
link   
reply to post by Perfectenemy
 


No I wouldn't, personally there are limitless historical events that I would go back to.



posted on Apr, 15 2011 @ 07:58 PM
link   
This video was supposeibly debunked.

www.youtube.com...

Stating that it was a Western Electric Model 34a hearing aid built in 1920.

www.hearingaidmuseum.com...



posted on Apr, 15 2011 @ 08:01 PM
link   
It's not a "she" it's a "he" dressed up as a woman. He's holding his hand against his face to hide the fact that it is a man dressed as a woman. Further, he isn't holding anything in his hand.

Anyone that examines the footage with software that can slow down the video frame-by-frame will see that his hand changes position revealing nothing to be in his hand as he starts messing with his hat/hair right at the end.


There's no hearing aid, no cell phone, no time traveler. Just a man dressed as a woman using his hand to hide his face. People should do some real and simple examinations of this stuff before taking others' conclusions at face value.



posted on Apr, 15 2011 @ 08:01 PM
link   
reply to post by steven704
 

It may be possible to vibrate forward, but the past is a used amount energy that can't be rewritten. Eventhough energy cannot be created or distroyed, once it has been played it cannot be played back. So even when you go into the so called future, there's no relation to remember upon. Be Here Now. The Bible says not to listen to fortune tellers, why?



posted on Apr, 15 2011 @ 08:09 PM
link   
Could this be some kind of 'Double Exposure' perhaps when the old film was put on a DVD - I don't know?????

Thanks for sharing S&F



posted on Apr, 15 2011 @ 08:14 PM
link   
While the hearing aid debunking seems the most likely case (as opposed to time travel -yet to be proven)... There was some really shoddy comments made in this case from the web in general.

"It couldn't be a cell phone cause they didn't have cell towers back then!"

So... If it were to be a time-traveler, it might be safer to say "communications device".




posted on Apr, 15 2011 @ 08:14 PM
link   
reply to post by Perfectenemy
 


Maybe she's talking to herself (into the hearing aid), just to hear her own voice. (maybe she just started using the aid)



posted on Apr, 15 2011 @ 08:17 PM
link   
There were no definite conclusions at all. The woman is more or less normal in stature, the viewing format was not correct. It is not often that one talks to a hearing aid. It is not a movie sequence, it is a docu of the "Circus" movie premier, and the people are not necessarily actors, just passers by. The film is part of a dvd and is thought to have been in the Chaplin collection, and although Chaplin was known to have edited old film in the latter years, that is not to say that this film was, just a possibilty. On the face of it, George Clarke's assumption is as good as any, as is some form of limited two way radio.
edit on 15-4-2011 by smurfy because: Text.



posted on Apr, 15 2011 @ 08:18 PM
link   
reply to post by steven704
 


If I recall, the original footage that was posted wasn't as clear as the one you posted. I analyzed this video and I have to say I agree with everything this guy is saying! The bent knuckles on the hand and the black piece she is holding is really hard to explain. I originally thought maybe she was holding her hand up to keep from being photographed or maybe holding part of her hat. This video really stumps me. Does this lady actually dissapear in the movie? If she does, that's really kind of amazing because I don't think back than they had the capabilities of editing or creating those types of effects! Star and flag for you my friend even though this was posted before. This really grabbed my attention and made me analyze if further.



posted on Apr, 15 2011 @ 08:24 PM
link   
reply to post by _BoneZ_
 



There's no hearing aid, no cell phone, no time traveler. Just a man dressed as a woman using his hand to hide his face. People should do some real and simple examinations of this stuff before taking others' conclusions at face value.


Can you post what you are talking about because this frame makes it look like he/she is holding something. Judging by the position of the knuckles and the dark area around the ear.




posted on Apr, 15 2011 @ 08:26 PM
link   
reply to post by steven704
 


Could be a case of two points in time blurring.



new topics

top topics



 
6
<<   2 >>

log in

join