reply to post by ShakaDoodle
The point is that it has already been produced.
It has been mentioned so many times. But the same process would apply to you that applies to Obama. If I wanted to verify that your birth certificate
was on file, the best that would happen would be an official from that state would check to see if it was infact on file.
If it were, he would tell me, yes Mr. the birth certificate is valid and is on file. If I asked to see it, it would not be allowed.
I don't understand why a federal offical verifying the document is on file isn't enough. Now we have to change the laws to allow anyone who just wants
to check to walk in and start searching records, to satisfy birthers.
When you run for President, there are background checks done. The qualifications you need to meet to be President are checked to be sure you fit. They
don't wait until you become President, then ask for a copy of your DL so they can check you out.
If you seriously think that Obama is not qualified to be President based on his birth status then it is a major conspiracy that encompasses large
facets of government. If infact the conspiracy is real, then it was perpetrated for a real reason, and you should worry about the end game.
As I see it, there is no legitimate reason to question or continue the "debate", other than just for the sake of doing it.
If you have a legitimate point, ask what it is, again, so it can be answered. I'm sure it already has.
Like the post I'm referring to with this one. That issue has been settled. If you are a birther, and do not feel that the "showing of the birth
certificate issue" has been answered by an official verifying the document exists, the same method that would apply if it were you, then explain why
that isn't sufficient for you.
edit on 4/16/2011 by ThaLoccster because: (no reason given)