It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by gwydionblack
What makes you think that 90% of these countries would be involved, and even more so, what makes you decide why some of these countries would be on the "home" or "away" team? Much less, what makes you think there would only be two teams?
A world war doesn't necessarily mean that every country in the world is involved, military wise. It is simply stating that the entire world is affected by the battles and the outcome due to the fact that many countries and continents will be involved.
Originally posted by croweboy
Home team would slaughter. US which is the single best military in the world, supported by all the other European military. Germany would be supplying tech. China and Russia wouldn't stand a chance, those two military are likely VERY effective on land, but no need to make it a land war. Too, China and other countries are pretty reliant on US food. Take that away and hungry soldiers wont be worried about fighting for too long.
Most of your countries are barely out of the stone age, I would take them out of the mix.