It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
And that's specified in which clause of the statute?
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Se point # 3. She was the director of Hawaii's Department of Health. She is the one who GRANTS access. As the head of the Dept, she HAS access.
Originally posted by ThaLoccster
reply to post by filosophia
Can you show me where in the Constitution it says a natural born citizen is one born on US soil to 2 parents who were also born on US soil.
Or for that matter, anything in the Constitution at all that defines what a natural born citizen is?
Originally posted by ThaLoccster
reply to post by filosophia
So this is the gist of what I've been saying all along. If infact Obama is not eligible based on his birth status and is somehow President than it encompasses a wide range of government, and would be a true conspiracy.
If all those government agencies covered this up, don't you think there is a more nefarious plan afoot than "Obamacare"?j
And should you be worried about that, or should you spend more time repeating the same lies as other "birthers"?
State Attorney General David Louie told the governor that it's against state law to release private documents, including an individual's birth documentation without the person's consent
Apples and oranges.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
And that's specified in which clause of the statute?
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Se point # 3. She was the director of Hawaii's Department of Health. She is the one who GRANTS access. As the head of the Dept, she HAS access.
Before she would do so, Fukino said, she wanted to inspect the files — and did so, taking with her the state official in charge of vital records
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
So you're just inferring that the department has access to their own records.
If you want to infer, doesn't the director of the department health work for the governor? And doesn't the boss usually have access to the records their subordinates have access to?
I can agree with this interpretation.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
My interpretation was, they can't give him a copy which he would then go show the public.
but if it's true the governor has no personal authority to verify the document, then former governor Lingle's claim about verifying the document should also be dismissed along with Abercrombie's alleged failure to be able to verify a long form birth certificate.
Fukimo said she has personally inspected it — twice. The first time was in late October 2008, during the closing days of the presidential campaign, when the communications director for the state's then Republican governor, Linda Lingle (who appointed Fukino) asked if she could make a public statement in response to claims then circulating on the Internet that Obama was actually born in Kenya.
State Attorney General David Louie told the governor that privacy laws barred him from disclosing an individual’s birth documentation without the person’s consent, a spokeswoman for the governor, Donalyn Dela Cruz, said Friday.
“There is nothing more that Governor Abercrombie can do within the law to produce a document,” Ms. Dela Cruz said.
...it shall be unlawful for any person to permit inspection of, or to disclose information contained in vital statistics records, or to copy or issue a copy of all or part of any such record, except as authorized by this part or by rules adopted by the department of health.
You were speaking to that, even though you don't know.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
As I said, I don't know specifically what the governor was looking for or where exactly he was looking. Or what they might let him see. I cannot speak to that. Now, is there a point to this?
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
I'm not sure where my logic fails.
(psssst: Hospitals don't keep birth certificates. That's why he couldn't find one)
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Also, Lingle said she ordered Fukino to make a statement about Kapiolani being the birthplace of Obama, and that Fukino did that, which was a lie or miscommunication, because Fukino never did that. I find that odd to say the least given all the questions about which hospital he was even born in and the conflicting stories about that.
"So I had my health director, who is a physician by background, go personally view the birth certificate in the birth records of the Department of Health, and we issued a news release at that time saying that the president was, in fact, born at Kapi'olani Hospital in Honolulu, Hawaii."
I don’t know if that’s exactly what happened, but from Fukino’s words that’s what I gather happened.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
In other words, the governor isn't an independent source of verification. Fukino said she saw the document. The governor essentially said "what she said"
Considering 99% of the birther claims are based on hearsay or anonymous blogs, this raises your suspicions now? At least both Lingle and Fukino put their jobs and names on the line.
....hearsay.
Why would the DOH have a circumcision document on file instead of their certificate?
Actually since nobody but Fukino has claimed to have seen the vital record (that I know of), wouldn't it be ironic if it was a based on a circumcision document?
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by Sinnthia
Is there a Long Form BC on file in Hawaii or not??
Simple yes or no please..
Originally posted by jibeho
It may not have been clear but I was referring to the Baptismal Cert. as a legal form of ID. I also posted the information on the Baptismal cert from the govt. site.
I was simply explaining that circ. cert was similar to the baptism. cert in the Jewish faith. Something that was not mentioned earlier. BTW. Obama is NOT Jewish so this element of the bill is just as irrelevant as your thread.
Just race baiting again.
Getting old. Obama the guy in the group photo with the big ears. Funny stuff
You're goiing to have to get more creative in the months to come.
AIR BALL.
Originally posted by Sinnthia
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by Sinnthia
Is there a Long Form BC on file in Hawaii or not??
Simple yes or no please..
Yes.
Simple enough?
Originally posted by Frontkjemper
reply to post by Sinnthia
Point of this thread is? You just have to accept the fact that people out there don't believe the President is legal.
NOTHING you can do about it. Just like you have people out there who DO believe he is legal, nothing birthers can do about that either.
So instead of wasting energy on something you can't change, do something productive.
Originally posted by filosophia
since you gave us a recap of the birther movement, I'll give you a recap of the Obama deception movement
You liberals believed Obama's birth certificate was legitimate because a website called "factcheck" .org verified it.
You assumed the website was legitimate because why would an organization call themselves factcheck if they didn't actually do factchecking, it's not like liberals are capable of lying, only conservative tea party Republican Koch brothers can do that.
You still trusted the document even though factcheck.org was funded by the Annenberg foundation of which Obama was a chairman on. You continued to trust the document when it was revealed that his sister had the same birth certificate even though she was born in Indonesia.
You liberals continued to say that Obama showed the birth certificate and anyone who denies this is racist. It was then revealed that a long form birth certificate was on file, and the governor of Hawaii vowed to find it to put the birther issue to rest, but he couldn't find it, but you continued to trust the president and changed tactics by saying that there was a long form birth certificate but it wasn't necessary because the short form is sufficient.
Then it was revealed that Obama is using a fake social security number but you laugh this off as ridiculous because that would imply Obama is guilty of a federal crime which goes against the sacred logic that the messiah can not be guilty of any wrong doing, doing so means you are racist.