It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Many scientists said Creation was not science. If so, why don’t they create an inhabitable Mars, or a bird or a grass? Answer: No one can ever do those things. The reasons are:
1.No humans can create a magnetic field for Mars.
2.No humans can create a soul for a bird or a grass. The souls of humans, birds, grasses are within the bodies of such organisms just as energy is within petroleum. Animal cells/organs are just physical expressins of the souls. Living animal organs cannot be separated from souls, which are unknown to scientists. Likewise, DNA is just like a typewriter expressing the souls.
If there is no science in creation, why do we need any scientists to create things? If there is no science in creation of life, how can created beings fit into ecosystems for hundreds of million years? All life exists owing to mutual help, not mutual warring.
Originally posted by mcsteve
Explain to me what the "soul" is since its the basis of your statement?
IMO its an illusion. Well not even that... Its just a lie.
Science is involved in what you call creation. The theory of evolution...
When asked whether the consciousness enters the fetus at the time of conception, Tucker pointed out that the Earth’s carrying capacity has been predicted to max out at 10 billion people. About 150 billion people are estimated to have walked the Earth, leaving plenty of consciousness to be recycled. If that’s true, there should be 150 billion living human beings on Earth. Tucker suggested that a possible reason there aren’t one 150 billion people currently walking the planet might be explained by some children's reports of spending time in heaven-like places between lives. Tucker speculated that our consciousness may act by free will and decide to return at varying times. Read more at Suite101: Evidence for the Soul and Reincarnation: Psychiatrist Studies Cases of Past Life Memories in Children www.suite101.com...
First, the physical atoms of the body are almost entirely replaced every seven years. Apart from a few aspects of our neurological system, the physical components of your body are continuously being regenerated. Thus, if you were solely your body, your identity would be constantly fluctuating. But practically and legally speaking, we know this is not true. In fact, our entire legal system is based upon sameness of identity over time. If you were just your body, then you couldn't be held accountable for a crime you committed in the past. Can you imagine a defendant saying to the judge, "It wasn't me! The person who committed that crime disappeared a long time ago." No reasonable judge would accept such a defense. There must be something non-physical that accounts for sameness of identity over time. The soul is the best explanation.
Originally posted by newcovenant
As for the soul, there are a couple of convincing re-incarnation stories that have no other explanation other than the existence of a soul.
Originally posted by linliangtai
reply to post by KrazyJethro
Do you know what is meant by the first word in this subject?
Originally posted by Serafine
reply to post by DisappearCompletely
Science, or the scientific method, can't "prove" a science. And the "scientific method" is what? Now think about your response.... I can give you a hint... is the "scientific method" a science? or a philosophy? or...?
Our readers want to know!
Originally posted by mysterioustranger
If you think you need eyes to see? Go talk to a blind person.
It is depressing how much a cesspool of intellectual dishonesty this forum has become.