Obama, Cameron and Sarkozy: no let-up in Libya until Gaddafi departs, page 1

privacy

Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times

Topic started on 15-4-2011 @ 12:07 AM by 5StarOracle

Obama, Cameron and Sarkozy: no let-up in Libya until Gaddafi departs

www.guardian.co.uk

US president reverses previously cautious approach to Libyan conflict and signs America up to more muscular intervention

President Obama today signals the return of America to the forefront of the international effort in Libya, writing a joint article with David Cameron and Nicolas Sarkozy in which the three leaders commit their countries to pursue military action until Colonel Gaddafi has been removed.

In the joint article, Obama reverses America's earlier cautious approach to the conflict – which saw th

(visit the link for the full news article)

reply posted on 15-4-2011 @ 12:07 AM by 5StarOracle

I wonder how much truth is in the statements that Gadhafi will not be made to leave by force...

Gaza settled down abit so the US may as well go back to playing in Libya...

I think it would be so much easier to remove Gadhafi by force, send in a real special team get it done right. But I guess that would be too fast...

www.guardian.co.uk
(visit the link for the full news article)

With Tripoli's rebel underground'They're going to catch me soon.' Libyan activist risks arrest to tell of guerrilla attacks and plans for suicide bombings

www.guardian.co.uk...

edit on 15-4-2011 by 5StarOracle because: add

reply posted on 15-4-2011 @ 12:57 AM by P3ACE0WAR

reply to post by 5StarOracle

Forceful regime change, taking sides in a civil war, arming rebels... The West's selective intervention has paved the way for ignorant fools to finally see the Wester hypocrisy.

reply posted on 15-4-2011 @ 02:28 AM by thoughtsfull

reply to post by P3ACE0WAR

I see it as the game for control of the world moving from economic warfare into the military arena.. I hope this i a short term thing, but suspect we are stuck on a path that will end in a major conflict and yet another devastating blow for us as a species.

reply posted on 15-4-2011 @ 03:33 AM by time91

So the CIA and the Anglo-American establishment decided to kind of escalate an unnecessary conflict to a kind of war. Duly noted...

reply posted on 15-4-2011 @ 03:40 AM by TREASONFX

The main culprits for war and oil again france britain america .
There is no doubt this conflict is about oil I was watching Sky news this morning when one guest was saying that BP have billions invested in Libya and started talking about how it has not been talked about etc then sky news reader says right moving on whilst the guy was still talking about the subject and making credible truth points- denial at best or media black out when oil is mentioned in a conflict.

reply posted on 15-4-2011 @ 07:06 AM by illuminatislut

I don't oppose all wars. What I am opposed to is a dumb war. What I am opposed to is a rash war.
Barack Obama