reply to post by IsaacKoi
Debunked! The FBI alien bodies memo
A very well researched and written piece for consideration. I tip my hat to you!
The unfortunate truth of UFO studies is that regardless of what you may believe to be fact, it is quite often the result of deliberate efforts to
create a specific path to be followed to a preferred conclusion. Making this even worse, is that both the pro and anti UFO camps engage in this kind
of behavior and have been since the whole thing began.
Society has been pretty much led by the nose since even before Roswell, the Battle over LA, Cape Girardeau and the Foo Fighters of WW2.
What does this mean for the average Joe who simply wants the truth?
The only safe conclusion that one can reach today is that to believe anything at all is a risk and the only safe route is to... well, trust no one at
At one time, I would argue here, at ATS, against what I saw as paranoia run amok, as there was thread after thread about disinfo agents and such. It
seemed destined to rip the community asunder and destroy civilized debate. But to be quite honest, I am now sure that I was wrong in that view and
that the web is not only stacked to the gills with people paid to scramble certain subject matter... that ATS itself may be nothing more than a
storefront for the CIA or some other domestic security and/or intelligence apparatus.
I mean, what a better way to keep an eye on the most avid, knowledgeable conspiracy buffs in the world than to create a place specifically designed to
attract them to in?
And like moths to a flame, we do indeed come.
Personally speaking, I have absolutely no doubts whatsoever, that UFOs are something more than Venus or temperature inversions or swamp gas. But
beyond that, to arrive at any sharply defined conclusion... and then to dare to publicly espouse it, is a fool's errand that will lead you around the
manic garden a hundred times before taking you to the eventual, painful, dead end.
Once again, great post and thanks for the time and effort!
edit on 15-4-2011 by redoubt because: Typos
edit on 15-4-2011 by redoubt because: More typos...