science on how HAARP *COULD* create an EQ

reply to post by adeclerk

Please link me to at least 3 other HAARP like facilities. I'll be eagerly awaiting your response.

Do a search mate..
I'm not here to humor you...

Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by adeclerk

 

Please link me to at least 3 other HAARP like facilities. I'll be eagerly awaiting your response.

Do a search mate..
I'm not here to humor you...

If they exist, it should be easy to link me to some evidence that they exist.

Or are they "top secret" so we can't know about them, thereby making the claim unfalsifiable?

reply to post by adeclerk


If you know so little about these facilities then actually doing some research will benefit you..
Just google haarp like facilities,,
It ain't hard..

Now go do some research..

Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by adeclerk

 

If you know so little about these facilities then actually doing some research will benefit you..
Just google haarp like facilities,,
It ain't hard..

Now go do some research..

Here, I did some research. Where are these facilities, again?

reply to post by adeclerk

I'm not playing your games..
Go bait somewhere else...
I don't believe you are that stupid...

Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by adeclerk

 

I'm not playing your games..
Go bait somewhere else...
I don't believe you are that stupid...

I'm stupid for searching google for atmospheric heating facilities and only coming up with HAARP (the only atmospheric heating facility that exists in the world).

Unless I missed one? Can you link me if I did? Help me deny my own ignorance of the existence of other atmospheric heating facilities.

ETA: here are some. Why don't they get blamed for causing earthquakes?

Oh yeah, because they can't.

Originally posted by optimus primal
interesting information. about the patents. there are a lot of patents on record. just because you've patented something doesn't mean it actually works. personally i think detecting earthquakes in the ionosphere is a far cry from causing them.

I though this adequately covered the OP.........& I see nothing else since hat causes me to change my mind about that.

A lot of people around ATS have a big problem differentiating things that are possibly related to something and things that cause something....this is just 1 more case

reply to post by backinblack


Well, I don't need to give a run down because Zorgon has done it for us...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

And I'm not going to go through every website of these facilities to find what you are too lazy to do yourself but here's a quick snapshot for you:

Few hundred research papers from EISCAT

Google Scholar search results for JORN

Link to JRO

I know this will entail a little effort but you need to click on the publications link then you can do a search, I just put the letter a into the title box and got over 700 results.

So, as I say, the information is out there...it's just that it makes little sense to us Layman's.

It's easier to make stuff up I guess.

reply to post by Chadwickus


Yes Zorgon did a good job convincing people the facilities could be linked and had military applications they don't tell us about..

Your point?

Originally posted by adeclerk

Originally posted by backinblack

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by backinblack

 

And as I said there, the information is available, you just gotta go find it.
so don't preach to me about denying ignorance when you're being lazy and choosing to be ignorant.

But being ignorant sometimes means believing everything you read..
There's so much we are NOT told..

What are the US bases in Australia for Chad?
What are their capabilities?

If you can't give me a full run down on them then it's obvious we don't know everything in regards to these facilities.

Please link me to at least 3 other HAARP like facilities. I'll be eagerly awaiting your response.

From Zorgon's thread..A post from Phage..

Out of all those installations, 4 of them seem have ionospheric heaters; HAARP, SURA, HIPAS, EISCAT. Maybe some of the rest do most most are strictly radar installations.

reply to post by backinblack


My point?

Also, there are many "HAARP like" facilities we know very little about..

I've made a start in answering this.

And you ignore it all.

Forget it.

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by backinblack

 

My point?

Also, there are many "HAARP like" facilities we know very little about..

I've made a start in answering this.
And you ignore it all.
Forget it.

But I don't see which side of the debate you are coming from..
Zorgon is pushing the military angle anf that the facilities may be linked..

You seem to push mere research and quote the HAARP website...

reply to post by backinblack


Some do have military purposes, such as over the horizon radar, my side of the argument is that they cannot create earthquakes, hurricanes, tornadoes or anything like that.

I'm addressing the (your) argument that there is no or little information about these facilities, this is wrong.

As I have said, there are hundreds of publications written about them and about what they do at them and from what I can tell, nothing to do with EQ's.

Originally posted by backinblack

Originally posted by adeclerk

Originally posted by backinblack

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by backinblack

 

And as I said there, the information is available, you just gotta go find it.
so don't preach to me about denying ignorance when you're being lazy and choosing to be ignorant.

But being ignorant sometimes means believing everything you read..
There's so much we are NOT told..

What are the US bases in Australia for Chad?
What are their capabilities?

If you can't give me a full run down on them then it's obvious we don't know everything in regards to these facilities.

Please link me to at least 3 other HAARP like facilities. I'll be eagerly awaiting your response.

From Zorgon's thread..A post from Phage..

Out of all those installations, 4 of them seem have ionospheric heaters; HAARP, SURA, HIPAS, EISCAT. Maybe some of the rest do most most are strictly radar installations.

This was already addressed in an edit to my post. Couldn't include that in a quote though, could you?

Where is there any evidence that these installations are causing natural disasters?

Oh right, you don't need evidence, you believe in chemtrails on faith alone.