reply to post by Stewie
Ahhhh....finally got a better connection and access to ATS Media uploads (MY end was the prob. NOT ATS!!).
So....here, these are what will be valid considerations of actual "Chemtrail" Pictures, with source included:
(Source?? Well, a volcano. Sorry, I didn't think to label the pic, from where I found it online, to name the exact volcano. Doesn't really matter,
Picture #3 (As viewed from a pilot's perspective):
Those, just representative examples of actual sources of real "chemtrails"....in the sense of any real, actual impact on the Earth's global "climate"
(even if only locally, in most instances). Although, some historical records have note of wide-spread, but still temporary, climactic changes from
very, very large volcanic eruptions....even far, far from the source.
In any case, even those MASSIVE spews of material, from the Earth, and Mother Nature herself....have had minimal effects, overall. Anyone who cares
may certainly research to discover the sorts of amounts estimated, per eruption. and, THEN...try to calculate just how
with our limited technology, attempt to match it in scale and scope......
A photo of the actual material, in the atmosphere. Gee.....where is it?? Actually, the sorts of contamination, the ash, the other chemicals that are
"supposed" to be in the "chem"-trails (the MYTH) as part of "geoengineering" are really invisible, to the Human eye....in the visible light spectrum.
In fact, when the Sun is up, and there are no clouds....the contribution of these gases tend to make the sky a more brilliant BLUE! "Rayleigh
is a term to look up, if you were unaware.
Of course, at low Sun angles, the light is refracted differently....and the effect of Rayleigh occurs in more pronounced ways (just as it does anyway,
at sunrise/sunset)....just, more vividly, because of the presence of the (unseen, visibly) material from the volcanic eruptions. (And, STILL no
edit on 14 April 2011 by weedwhacker because: (no reason given)