It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Rockstrongo37
You tell me what's more crazy, to believe that everything that is just "happened" or that some where somehow, an intelligence beyond our understanding (remember the human brain is limited in its ability to grasp the big picture),that something or someone started all this and did so intentionally.
Originally posted by Noncompatible
Ok, challenge accepted. If the universe was designed by a creator, who then went on to create us (his chosen children) in his image, why is the majority of said creation downright hostile ?
The majority of this planetary enviroment is none to friendly towards non technological societies and it gets worse once you leave our fragile little nest.
These simple facts alone show a lack of design, intelligent or otherwise. In our natural state we filled our niche in the food chain. Language, opposable thumbs, science and technology have allowed us to defy nature.
Originally posted by idonotcollectstamps
It might not be perfect but it SURE as dook nuggets beats saying "The bible tells us that God created life on Earth, now lets try and find evidence to back that up with". Seriously which are you going to go with? The Scientific method or God did it? Seriously? I will give you a hint, one of these methods is searching for the truth and for answers, one is only concerned with validating the Bible and God and will never deviate from this course.
Originally posted by ErgoTheConfusion
Originally posted by idonotcollectstamps
It might not be perfect but it SURE as dook nuggets beats saying "The bible tells us that God created life on Earth, now lets try and find evidence to back that up with". Seriously which are you going to go with? The Scientific method or God did it? Seriously? I will give you a hint, one of these methods is searching for the truth and for answers, one is only concerned with validating the Bible and God and will never deviate from this course.
It's like you've chosen to selectively ignore the posts in here that have had nothing to do with the bible or "Hur hur Gurd Did It". There are people in here who reject biblical creationism as strongly as you. In fact more so because it continues to distract otherwise well intentioned people such as yourself from looking deeper into a subject that *deserves* a deeper look.
Also, careful... you are a little behind on where science is going. I've offered a few points of purely scientific data for people to look into, as well as the Incompleteness Theorems to help open the perspectives to a broader view.
Biocentrism is just *one* of the views that is emerging that is flipping all this linear time materialism absurdity on its head.
Originally posted by ErgoTheConfusion
I did. However in the rest of your response you made it very clear you don't understand the evidence yet... and aren't willing to do the legwork.
Typical couch potato scientist asking everyone else to think for them.
Originally posted by ErgoTheConfusionI didn't in any way shape or form ask you or anyone else to take anything blindly.
Originally posted by ErgoTheConfusionI offered some items for personal research further. I might suggest you hold the mirror up to yourself to consider whether you've put the approach to understanding you purport to use under the same scrutiny and what you might be taking blindly from what you've been taught without *truly* knowing it for a fact.
Originally posted by ErgoTheConfusionI offered three significant points of information that give a good foundation for a *scientific* mind to use to understand how the claim the other person made can be understood. I'm sorry you don't understand yet, and that's ok. We all find our path in our own way. To give a metaphor... you are currently looking at Davinci's drawings (time, matter, infinity, consciousness) and saying "Pfffft! Those flying machines don't make no sense!"
Originally posted by ErgoTheConfusionAs for your partial attack upon imagination
Originally posted by ErgoTheConfusion... please spend more time reading what the highest minds in scientific history have had to say about imagination and/or faith (not blind religious dogmatic faith, though I fear you may have a hard time reading that word and understanding it in any other context).
Originally posted by PieKeeper
How do you know? Can you test for this? How is this verified?
Please, do tell.
Originally posted by meeneecat
You understand? Well, I tried.
Originally posted by idonotcollectstamps
I hope that someday you will be more than a "Couch potato Scientist". So far all you have presented is Creationism with the word "Infinity" instead of God. Saying that infinity is aware of itself is not any different. Learn some science and how the scientific method works. You will be amazed at the results you achieve rather than using speculation and philosophy.
Originally posted by DocWicked
The theory of Evolution violates two laws of science. The Second Law of Thermodynamics ...The Law of Biogenesis
See Source Below
The second law of thermodynamics says no such thing. It says that heat will not spontaneously flow from a colder body to a warmer one or, equivalently, that total entropy (a measure of useful energy) in a closed system will not decrease. This does not prevent increasing order because
* the earth is not a closed system; sunlight (with low entropy) shines on it and heat (with higher entropy) radiates off. This flow of energy, and the change in entropy that accompanies it, can and will power local decreases in entropy on earth.
* entropy is not the same as disorder. Sometimes the two correspond, but sometimes order increases as entropy increases. (Aranda-Espinoza et al. 1999; Kestenbaum 1998) Entropy can even be used to produce order, such as in the sorting of molecules by size (Han and Craighead 2000).
* even in a closed system, pockets of lower entropy can form if they are offset by increased entropy elsewhere in the system.
In short, order from disorder happens on earth all the time.
The only processes necessary for evolution to occur are reproduction, heritable variation, and selection. All of these are seen to happen all the time, so, obviously, no physical laws are preventing them. In fact, connections between evolution and entropy have been studied in depth, and never to the detriment of evolution (Demetrius 2000).
Several scientists have proposed that evolution and the origin of life is driven by entropy (McShea 1998). Some see the information content of organisms subject to diversification according to the second law (Brooks and Wiley 1988), so organisms diversify to fill empty niches much as a gas expands to fill an empty container. Others propose that highly ordered complex systems emerge and evolve to dissipate energy (and increase overall entropy) more efficiently (Schneider and Kay 1994).
See Source Below
The spontaneous generation that Pasteur and others disproved was the idea that life forms such as mice, maggots, and bacteria can appear fully formed. They disproved a form of creationism. There is no law of biogenesis saying that very primitive life cannot form from increasingly complex molecules.