French ban on Islamic face veil comes into force, page 4


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 44 times


reply posted on 11-4-2011 @ 09:30 AM by 23432
Originally posted by PurpleDog UK


ProtoplasmicTraveler and 2432

I get what you are saying, ie.. this is a thin end of the wedge to 'control' the general public BUT one thing you appear to both be missing is the Intimidation that wearing a Viel in public brings to those who are not part of that faith or , dare I say want to understand it......



Well , I can understand the issue of the intimidation .
Frankly speaking I am almost always uncomfortable in the presence of a women who is wearing a burqa .
My reasons to feel unwelcome in her presence is much more realistic .
By wearing such a garment she is stating a fact that she wants no male attention . That is what burqa tells me and I accept it .

It is similar to a situation where you happened to be walking behind a woman in a dark street and in order to make her feel safer , you would cross the road to the otherside .

When I see a Burqa wearing women , I just look away from them because that is why they are wearing the burqa .



In public, like wearing a crash helmet (not allowed in a bank foir obvious reasons) or a Hoodie (anti social for many reasons) or a scarf around one's face (aka recent protests in London et al) they are all intimidating to the vast number of those law abiding citizens who want to be peaceful and safe.........



While I understand and appreciate your genuine concern ; I need to add that this concern is really not justified and it is somewhat superficially installed in non muslims .
Think of it like this ; a woman who chooses to wear the damn thing is only following her individual right to wear what she likes .
It is not her intention to scare anyone . All she is asking : Leave me alone .
Under these circumstances , I can't see a justifieable reason to make her not wear what she wants to wear .




You both seem to be looking for excuses to help the minority cause to the detriment of the majority .......



Au Contraire , we are pointing out a far more fundamental flaw . Legislation of these type of nonsense has never worked in known history . It has always amounted to further erosion of individual's rights.



In public, why not have rules...... In private in your own space, home or whatever (where you don't affect others) then do what you want to .....simples..

PDUK



It would not work .
Turks banned burqa since 1923 and all it did was to make it more popular .



I wish it was as easy as banning but unfortunately , it doesn't look that way .

It is , in essence a gender issue which is wrapped up in a traditional cloak and placed on the alter of Islam .

Garment itself is the tool for a political power . These women who wear it voluntarly are in fact sending a message their non burqa wearing counterparts . The message says that they are morally superior .

That is the background of the issue we are discussing in here .

One girl is saying to another girl that she is better then her because of the garment she chooses to wear .

How would a legislation help in this crazy situation ?




edit on 11-4-2011 by 23432 because: gr



reply posted on 11-4-2011 @ 09:30 AM by mr-lizard
reply to post by ProtoplasmicTraveler



I think it's a matter of culture and not terrorism. Parallel multi-cultures just don't work.

If you invite someone into your house for a meal Proto, you'd expect them to remove their shoes, wash their hands and have good table manners.

If the people you invite into your house start bothering your cat, treading mud around the house and refuse to wash their hands after using the loo, as well as insulting your wife's cooking, i'm assuming you wouldn't be too happy.


reply posted on 11-4-2011 @ 09:32 AM by bluemirage5
reply to post by PurpleDog UK



The burqua is not welcome in Western nations and I applaud France for this move.



reply posted on 11-4-2011 @ 09:34 AM by torqpoc
Dear Dreine,
Originally posted by Dreine
reply to
post by ProtoplasmicTraveler



PT,

You are one of the more intelligent and thoughtful posters I've ran across on ATS, and I respect your opinions for the most part.

However, by trying to boil this conversation down into a simple matter of 'clothing' I think you are doing Purpledog and others on this thread a great disservice.


Thank you for posting that, I wholeheartedly agree and would actually like to go further.

Stating the Burqua is only for the sake of modesty displays nothing but ignorance, it also is completely devoid of any insight into the mistaken interpretation of a few lines within the Qu'ran. It blatently symbolises the oppression of women. Were that to happen in the US the government would be up in arms, however because this is happening in France and sadly targets a specific religious group the liberals are going to use any and all arguements to cry about the infringement of personal rights without having any insight or experience.

I, for one, am ashamed at some of the thoughtless comments i've read today here.

Thank you for airing my thoughts.

Regards,
T
edit on 11-4-2011 by torqpoc because: (no reason given)
edit on 11-4-2011 by torqpoc because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 11-4-2011 @ 09:43 AM by ProtoplasmicTraveler
reply to post by torqpoc



You know I took the time to reply to your U2U to me, you might want to take the time to read it.

You really are being played, and that's your choice to want to do so, but do bear in mind that the more you explain yourself the more you are displaying it's all about not liking a religion.

So in all reality what you are arguing for is there should be no religious freedom amongst religions you wouldn't join.

While at the same time having a hard time figuring out why people who belong to those targeted religions might not like you.

Lack of religious tolerance is what drives the underlying support of almost every war of aggression on the planet and the elite are using those phobias, fears and superstitions to slowly reshape the world into a increasinly more authoritarian New World Order that ultimately will backfire on not just all the religious but everyone.

People are foolish when they have these kind of knee jerk reactions the only thing you are winning is giving the government more power to regulate and dictate and it has to much of that already and accomplishes nothing good with it.

We need less government and not more government.


reply posted on 11-4-2011 @ 09:50 AM by ProtoplasmicTraveler
Originally posted by mr-lizard
reply to
post by ProtoplasmicTraveler



Proto, I usually agree with a lot of your posts. But i think France are 100% correct in making this decision. If it only affects (at the most) 2000 muslim women out of the 5 million muslim inhabitants, and only THREE people protested and this protects the security and attitudes of the French nation - then i'm all for it.

Unless of course countries like Saudi Arabia start allowing us a little freedom in their countries. Then muslims should adhere to French law.



Truth be told I am not concerned about Islamic Women being effected I am concerned about the Government being granted a right it should not have.

So much power that those who do attempt to protest in Western Democracies at places like the G-20 are labelled anarchists, and hooligans and vandals while being beaten with trunchons sprayed with water, and blasted with sound cannons.

And you want to give the government more power to regulate?

Power that must be alright if people don't protest, yet if people do protest it makes no matter, they are defamed, and put down like dogs.

You people really do need to wake up.

This is all going to end very badly for you if you can't stop fighting petty battles to man up and fight the big ones.

Our governments are bankrupt, out of control, at perpetual war and causing the refugee crisis through it that is driving the very Muslims you fear into your nations to get out of harms way of the bombs you are paying to drop on them.

Do they like you very much? Chances are no, and common sense would display why, you pay to drop bombs on them and vilify them every chance you get, and justify robbing them of their own freedoms and life based on fears that they might do the same to you.

We need to get power back in the hands of the people, not put more in the hands of the government.

The government isn't doing this to protect you, the government is doing this simply to expand its own power and give it one more.


reply posted on 11-4-2011 @ 09:58 AM by ProtoplasmicTraveler
reply to post by deessell



Speaking of invissible shadows, could I have your number please!

Your social security number!

Your Drivers License Number!

Your Checking Account Number!

Your Membership Number!

Your Reference Number!

Your Discount Savings Plan Number!

Your Credit Card Number!

We are all already invissible to the point that we are nothing but numbers to the government and the corporations.

I wouldn't kid yourself on that score, you are in reality to the very people you are looking to protect you from your own fears and prejudices nothing but a number.

Here in the United States the right to privacy and anonymity was a central part of what the Founders were fighting for.

Things that have long since been given up by evangalical Christians who won't compromise on anything that is construed as sin, and people afraid of people who aren't just like them.

Now the Government can spy, tap, intrude anywhere it wants.

Yeah you have the right to be seen, virtually naked with a dangerous scanner that emmits harmful radiation at the airport.

You must be proud!


reply posted on 11-4-2011 @ 09:59 AM by mr-lizard
reply to post by ProtoplasmicTraveler



But not every government is the same. Not all governments are interested in pandering to a tiny minority, some would like to keep their culture as it is, without having to feel forced into guilt for doing so.


reply posted on 11-4-2011 @ 10:05 AM by Dreine
reply to post by ProtoplasmicTraveler



PT,

At this point your reply posts seem to be a bit demeaning to those of us who do not share you view of this topic. I would have expected a bit more tact and sound rationale behind them.

You know quite well that many ATS'er, including myself, share your view of all the smoke and mirrors used by very powerful elite entities and individuals who are positioning themselves to take command of the world through what more and more seems to be an economic apocalypse. That much appears to be obvious.

But if you think that one nation's government, even if it is a puppet institution, is taking the time out of it's world domineering scheming to use burqa's as a means to divide us even farther (if possible), then I think you are very mistaken.

But those are my thoughts and opinions, and although we do not agree, I'm happy that at least we have the means with which to share this argument.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^




ATS Live North America is broadcasting now.
Today's Show: ATS Live:162: Tornados! Murder! Cover Ups! Obama-Gate! WOW!