7.1 earthquake in Japan NOW... Tsunami warning! Fukushima power plant problem solved!

page: 4
74
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join

posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 05:05 AM
link   
reply to post by Vitchilo
 


The sun dictates earths activities.




posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 05:05 AM
link   

Originally posted by trilogy111
reply to post by pleasetryagain
 

Hi the flashing light report has a still photo on yahoo.com news also on yahoo news uk article 'mysterious light spotted during Japan earthquake' shows what you have seen .


Link, man! Are you daft?



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 05:07 AM
link   
reply to post by AnotherYOU
 


I too questioned the 'aftershock' description, as I always thought aftershocks were small. However, the definition below answers this....

'An aftershock is a smaller earthquake that occurs after a previous large earthquake, in the same area of the main shock. If an aftershock is larger than the main shock, the aftershock is redesignated as the main shock and the original main shock is redesignated as a foreshock. Aftershocks are formed as the crust around the displaced fault plane adjusts to the effects of the main shock'.

Ref: en.wikipedia.org...



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 05:08 AM
link   
reply to post by trilogy111
 


Yes, this is OLD -- from a couple days ago, but here's the link anyway:

uk.news.yahoo.com...

Reapeat: THIS IS NOT THE FLASH from 45 minutes ago...



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 05:22 AM
link   
reply to post by Pseudonaut
 

no i'm not daft, I'm new, please go easy man ..bear with me here



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 05:25 AM
link   
reply to post by Pseudonaut
 


yes you are right its 8 April, but same description, sorry if this confused matters.



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 05:37 AM
link   
reply to post by Vitchilo
 


Please dont bring CME's into this possible new tragedy in Japan.
nobody doubts CME's happening. That happens all the time

I wonder what will happen to the nuclear plants this time. Because radioactive leaks are more dangerous than CME. This is the REAL danger.



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 05:44 AM
link   

Originally posted by Moxiaty
reply to post by Vitchilo
 


Please dont bring CME's into this possible new tragedy in Japan.

Please don't bring CME into this? What? Next time there's two cars that crash into each other you'll tell me to not bring cars into the discussion?

CME doesn't make it worst or better. It's just a factor of the equation. I don't get your post at all.

Or are you trying to tell me that 99.8% of the mass of the solar system (the sun) has no effect on earth? Please.
edit on 11-4-2011 by Vitchilo because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 05:50 AM
link   
reply to post by Vitchilo
 


I dont get your post - you are blaming CMEs for EQs. I never seen anyone other than here doing that - scientists also says it has nothing to do with it.

Sometimes its best to know who to trust.. Just saying..



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 05:56 AM
link   
reply to post by Moxiaty
 


I'm not saying earthquakes are CREATED by CMEs, but they can be triggered by CMEs And it's now 100% of the time CMEs hit, it's more like 60-75% of the time.

And we don't need scientists to tell us everything. We can think by ourselves with empirical evidence, thank you very much.



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 06:11 AM
link   
reply to post by Vitchilo
 


Where's this empirical evidence?



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 06:17 AM
link   
reply to post by Vitchilo
 


Good Morning - Yawnnnnn, Just grabbed my coffee turned on the PC and was thinking as it was booting up, how before I went to bed last night I was suprised to see no larger quake and thought, I thought that CMA was suppose to hit. Well then here we have it. I truly believe CMA's help to trigger larger quakes as I have been wathching this now for some time. I appears that they have the most effect in an unstable area - IMHO

Those poor folks in Japan I am wishing them the best. Unfortunately, I am thinking another larger quake is yet to hit. --- and a whole lot of other things that I just won't post here.



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 06:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by Vitchilo
 


Where's this empirical evidence?


We've seen it time and time again how CME are triggering earthquakes. I bet there's a thread on it on ATS.

Or at least somewhere on the internet, it exists.



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 06:23 AM
link   
reply to post by Vitchilo
 


I found this...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

edit on 11/4/11 by Chadwickus because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 06:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by Vitchilo
 


I found this...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

edit on 11/4/11 by Chadwickus because: (no reason given)


Dead link but I;m guessing that's your 26% thread..



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 06:54 AM
link   
reply to post by backinblack
 


Nope it wasn't..

fixed link:
www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 06:58 AM
link   
reply to post by Chadwickus
 


OK, I've read that thread along with yours..
Some theories are stating it's not so much the highs and lows in solar activity but more the rapid change..
What do you think of that theory?



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 07:07 AM
link   
Another one just hit



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 07:21 AM
link   
reply to post by backinblack
 


Well that seems a bit shaky if you ask me.

For example, the big X28 flare that came out of nowhere in 2003 would surely be considered a rapid change surely and no significant earthquake event occurred.

But of course this is only one example.



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 07:24 AM
link   
reply to post by Chadwickus
 


Fair enough..
Personally I think, if anything, something like solar activity may bring on an earthquake that is going to happen soon anyway..
I see no way that it would actually create an earthquake..
Hope that makes sense..




top topics
 
74
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join