Originally posted by HardbeatAcolyte
reply to post by Quickfix
Originally posted by Quickfix
No, I don’t agree that it is accurate, the Bible has been tampered with, it is not accurate anymore, the Illuminati have had their hands on it for
over 1,000 years. Their bloodline goes back to the Money Changers at the Temple…
You state this as fact. Respectfully, just how much solid evidence is available to support these Illuminati claims? How do you know that the
original message of the books present in the Bible has been lost? I personally haven't seen anything that proves these theories.
Originally posted by Quickfix
Also like you said some books were left out, so how can a book with missing pieces be accurate?
The pieces left out were left out for a reason…not because they aren’t authentic; Carbon Testing of the Scrolls was accurate. Not Surprising since
that form of testing has proven accurate over and over again.
I personally think that age is not the only neccessary indication of authenticity, and they were left out because they were not entirely consistent
with the rest of the Bible. If this is true, then I think that they were either not divinely inspired, or had been corrupted - either way, they would
not have been appropriate for inclusion. That is only my opinion though, and I don't really know as much about the apocrypha as I should
edit on 9/4/11 by HardbeatAcolyte because: (no reason given)
There is a ton of evidence supporting the Illuminati are the people that control the creation and issuance of money.
And Money controls the people..
The Bible works fine, it does what it is meant to, distract people and keep them under control.
So, even when books found and they are as old as the same time era with tested carbon dating, going back to the same time period you still think it
isn't accurate... Radio Carbon Dating does not lie. The books left out were inconsistent, because they contradict the foundation of the Bible and what
is it meant for...control
Jesus was a man that found out what was going on at the Temple and of course got upset and they silenced him...he was a wiseman, not a divine
Why do you think In God we Trust is on money? It is because God is the sun for without it there would be no life. The Illuminati worship the sun, the
law of fives, and Baal.
Why do you think it wouldn't be divinely inspired? If all the books like people say are "divinely inspired" what makes the book of Thomas any
different? Just because it wasn't put in the bible and it doesn't mean it should be left out..because it is "inaccurate" like you've said...need I
remind you Thomas was a Disciple for Jesus..it should of been added when found, not discredited..
There is a ton of evidence supporting control over people and the manipulation of money to control said people..
Here are a few links for you to browse through until I have more time tonight to add more.
The Vatican Secret Library
The Vatican and Galileo
The Rothschilds change their name
Some History of the Rothschilds Banking Family
Thread on history links included
The Georgian Guide Stones related to the Rosicrucianism
The Money Changers at the temple and in the Bible
Video on the Money Changers www.youtube.com...
Video on Religion www.bibliotecapleyades.net...
That should be enough to get you started.
edit on 9-4-2011 by Quickfix because: (no reason given)
edit on 9-4-2011 by Quickfix because: Grammer and spelling