911 Survivor Won't Back Down

Does anyone know a good place to get up to date and current info on this as it unfolds?

Originally posted by TakingTheRedPill
Does anyone know a good place to get up to date and current info on this as it unfolds?

Not I, but please post the link here if you find it.

reply to post by FDNY343


[snip]
And jet fuel evaporates so fast yet it wouldn't in the towers, somehow it burned continously and got hotter constantly while maintaining its destructive power and weight according to the trusters, oh yes and ofc there would be no conflict of interest, they are just cousins after all that hold high positions of power , as is common in the world

I am from New Haven CT and have just talked to my brother two minutes ago and he said NOBODY in new haven has even heard of the trial.
IT IS NOT in the NEW HAVEN REGISTER or on ACTION NEWS 8 and my brother watches the news (too much i think) and gets the newspaper everyday yet NOTHING.
Does anyone find this rather interesting.
But the home invasion case in Cheshire is everywhere and even the trial of the police officers.
I was a child when the Black Panther trials were held in New Haven and it was everywhere and we even had a curfew.
Is this not bigger than the Black Panther trials yet no mention in the media outlets of any kind.
He said he would try to find out any info for me so hopefully i find out something.

I also just called William Veale at 925-212-3678 and left message asking why no media coverage.
Media contact: William Veale [email protected], [email protected], 510-845-5675, 925-212-3678

reply to post by laslidealist

apparently hooper knows more about the pentagon than the woman with clearance that works there so we are wrong and obviously he is right from seeing the events after they unfold rather than the woman who was there in real time.
Hooper is going by second hand info (unless he did not disclose he was actually there) and dismisses the woman's info who actually lived through it and yes i guess he's right in that the news and our gov't officals never lie or hide the truth.
If hooper was to admit something just is not right then his world would crash and burn so much easier to believe everything you're told and please don't tell hooper that Santa and the Easter bunny are not real

Huh? What woman? What are you talking about? What is not "right" that I need to admit to? Are you talking about some conspirafact you read on some conspiracy website?

reply to post by hooper


You can't be serious?
Please share your drugs as i would like some so i don't feel the pain any more.
If you don't know then please don't post as you are completely unaware of anything.
So you made comments but don't know anything how very interesting yet i am suppose to take you seriously.


Amidst Growing World Doubts About 9/11, Career Army Officer Takes Bush Administration Officials to Court April 5th Represented by the Center for 9/11 Justice
Center for 9/11 Justice

NEW YORK, March 23, 2011 --

/PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- A December 2010 poll conducted by the prestigious Emnid Institute, and reported in the German magazine "Welt der Wunder," revealed that 89.5% of German respondents do not believe the official story of 9/11.

The issue is heating up in America as well, and will soon be heard in court.

Top Secret Military Specialist April Gallop saw disturbing things up close that have not been reported in the media.

On the morning of September 11, 2001, she was ordered by her supervisor to go directly to work at the Pentagon, before dropping off her ten-week-old son Elisha at day care.

Amazingly, the infant was given immediate security clearance upon arrival.

The instant Gallop turned on her computer an enormous explosion blew her out of her chair, knocking her momentarily unconscious.

Escaping through the hole reportedly made by Flight 77, she saw no signs of an aircraft – no seats, luggage, metal, or human remains. Her watch (and other clocks nearby) had stopped at 9:30-9:31 a.m., seven minutes before the Pentagon was allegedly struck at 9:38 a.m.

The 9/11 Commission reported that "by no later than 9:18 a.m., FAA centers in Indianapolis, Cleveland, and Washington were aware that Flight 77 was missing and that two aircraft had struck the World Trade Center."

Why then were there no anti-aircraft defenses, Gallop asks, or alarm warnings inside the Pentagon?

Gallop was briefed by officials not to tell her story in public; she also received an email from a Fox News reporter who had been told by the Pentagon not to interview her.

Gallop now believes that officials within the Bush Administration conspired to destroy the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center and WTC 7 – the third building brought down at 5:20 p.m. that day – with pre-placed explosives detonated after the planes hit.

On April 5th, 2011, at 11 a.m., at the Federal Courthouse at 141 Church Street in New Haven, Connecticut, the case of Gallop v. Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Myers will be heard by the United States Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit.

Gallop's case relies on virtually all forms of evidence admissible in court, but significantly, on published scientific evidence that residues of these explosives were found in the rubble after the attacks. In its totality the proffered case establishes that the government hypothesis – that the buildings collapsed due to fire in combination with the airplane impacts – is scientifically untenable.

In addition, Ms. Gallop will, through photographic and other physical evidence, as well as the testimony of a multitude of military and civilian survivors, demonstrate the impossibility of her having lived through the attack on the Pentagon if it had taken place as the government and the defendants claim.

German Federal Judge, Deiter Dieseroth, stated in December 2009 that:

"No independent court has applied legal procedures to review the available evidence on who was responsible for the attacks."

Also, that "it is not acceptable for a constitutional state...to declare war, bomb a foreign country, and place it under military occupation," without first identifying suspects.

Dieseroth also said the U.S. "was under burden of proof" that Osama bin Laden was responsible for the attacks, yet the FBI admits it has no evidence presentable in court to back this up.

The stakes in this case are epic, including the possibility of an overwhelming transformation of the world's understanding of history, not to mention American citizens' relationship with their government.

Media contact: William Veale [email protected], [email protected], 510-845-5675, 925-212-3678

SOURCE Center for 9/11 Justice

Read more: www.heraldonline.com...

reply to post by laslidealist


You realize of course, that US newswire and PR newswire are not news service, correct? They are public relations services that prepare public relations releases based on their clients demands.

i find it hilarious that there are still people willing to belive the official 911 story ,
this video is a pardoy of the official version / news media coverage
beliving in the official version is like thinking the muslim guy from the video is talking for real

reply to post by laslidealist

/PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- A December 2010 poll conducted by the prestigious Emnid Institute, and reported in the German magazine "Welt der Wunder," revealed that 89.5% of German respondents do not believe the official story of 9/11.

Wrong.

The issue is heating up in America as well, and will soon be heard in court.

Boy, even you don't believe that lump of BS do you? Issue heating up? C'mon. There is no issue and all that's going to be heard in court is some judge telling a couple of lawyers to stop wasting the court's time.

Top Secret Military Specialist April Gallop saw disturbing things up close that have not been reported in the media.

"Top Secret Military Specialist"? Wow, is that wild one! I, personally, was a Super-duper secret agent and don't remember meeting her.

On the morning of September 11, 2001, she was ordered by her supervisor to go directly to work at the Pentagon, before dropping off her ten-week-old son Elisha at day care.

Oh, the hell with it, the rest of this is just as screwy. Infant given security clearance. If you really want the low down on this "case" read the first judges findings. Pretty good.

Click here to learn more about this warning.

reply to post by hooper

You are right about the trial because i grew up in New Haven CT and let's see we had a mobster as a police chief and then he became mayor and completely ruined the city and then when the bottom finally gave out and the city was bankrupt he called it quits. How about a little club called Skull and Bones which just so happens to have none other than Bushy and his family as members.
Oh yes and the governor of CT went to jail for corruption but good place to hold the hearing don't you think.
Did you also know that Yale owns half of New Haven CT and buying more and more of it every year and hey who went to Yale?
New Haven and CT itself is probably thee most corrupt state there is so you are probably right about it getting thrown out just not for the right reason though.
BTW you didn't know anything about this woman and now you know more about her in 10 minutes then the rest of us, so i guess i can't argue with a man that can learn that much in 10 minutes.

reply to post by Yankee451

Just received a call from Mr. Veale and as i already knew growing up in New Haven about the corruption and the Yale connection sure enough they tried to have Bush's relative taken off the case but it was denied so they have filed another motion which he says is a long way away.
G.W, was born at Yale hospital New Haven Ct and has quite a few connections to Yale and New Haven CT but hey no conflict of interest here.
He said it should be in the USA TODAY and CNN

Click here to learn more about this warning.

Originally posted by laslidealist
reply to post by Yankee451

 

Just received a call from Mr. Veale and as i already knew growing up in New Haven about the corruption and the Yale connection sure enough they tried to have Bush's relative taken off the case but it was denied so they have filed another motion which he says is a long way away.
G.W, was born at Yale hospital New Haven Ct and has quite a few connections to Yale and New Haven CT but hey no conflict of interest here.
He said it should be in the USA TODAY and CNN

Much obliged for your information, thanks.

Originally posted by laslidealist
reply to post by hooper

 

You are right about the trial because i grew up in New Haven CT and let's see we had a mobster as a police chief and then he became mayor and completely ruined the city and then when the bottom finally gave out and the city was bankrupt he called it quits. How about a little club called Skull and Bones which just so happens to have none other than Bushy and his family as members.
Oh yes and the governor of CT went to jail for corruption but good place to hold the hearing don't you think.
Did you also know that Yale owns half of New Haven CT and buying more and more of it every year and hey who went to Yale?
New Haven and CT itself is probably thee most corrupt state there is so you are probably right about it getting thrown out just not for the right reason though.
BTW you didn't know anything about this woman and now you know more about her in 10 minutes then the rest of us, so i guess i can't argue with a man that can learn that much in 10 minutes.

edit on 7-4-2011 by laslidealist because: (no reason given)

Wow, I'd get out of CT if I were you. Listen, I understand, you're trying to set yourself up for the failure that is about to come. Its OK, you got your scapegoats all lined up and ready to take the blame when the judge throws this stuff right out of court. By the way, I never claimed to know anything about her, but even an idiot can see there's no such thing as a top secret military specialist and they don't give security clearance to infants.

Originally posted by GrinchNoMore
lol you are all the same, "can you cite a source" ? How about opening your eyes to the pictures noob.

So, i'll take that as a no?

Originally posted by GrinchNoMore
And jet fuel evaporates so fast yet it wouldn't in the towers, somehow it burned continously and got hotter constantly while maintaining its destructive power and weight according to the trusters,

Strawman. The fuel either burned off on impact, or within 10 minutes or so. Nothing left after that but office fires.

Originally posted by GrinchNoMore
oh yes and ofc there would be no conflict of interest, they are just cousins after all that hold high positions of power , as is common in the world

Why would there be, when Bush is not being sued?

Originally posted by impressme
reply to post by FDNY343

 

How is it a conflict of interest, if George Bush isn't even named in the suit?

Obviously you didn’t read the OP. Troll much.

I certainly did. I have been following April Gallop's lawsuits since her last one was thrown out with prejudice.

Maybe I missed it, by is Bush named in the lawsuit?

Yes

No

Pick one.