Why are both Bushes missing from the list?

Originally posted by idunno12

I am not fully familiar with how wikipedia works.

Does your statement mean that you could have just added the Bush clones to the Yale Law list and there they would be forever more? Even if its not true? Are there no safeguards against this at all?

If not, then why even have something like that. If people are using this as a form of information, I can not even imagine how mucked up our knowledge of history is going to be in a few years.

Yep, you or I, could add whatever we want to wiki. There are other random people, or wiki itself, that will come through and correct the page. Sometimes there is a little icon to indicate that a fact or rather a claim requires citation.

Once, I came across a randomly inserted pornographic quote, it was removed within a few hours, but needless to say it wasn't factual to the topic.

Originally posted by DogsDogsDogs
reply to post by searching4truth

 

(pokes you back) picky picky. The OP doesn't say that, just Yale alumni.

I know I know, it's a flaw ......but but but the link goes to Yale Law Alum, oh but there I go picking again.