It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jdub297
Originally posted by amazing
Interesting...I'll say that. I'll be watching. PAC northwest here as well...so a vested interest here.
Sorry, that's not exactly what he "predicted:"
Originally posted by Thermo KleinOne of the areas previously mentioned in the blog was "Western North America" but with no specific date. Anyone could make that prediction so I'll hold off 'til I get specifics.
Now "Western North America" begins in Southern Mexico, would include the Yucatan peninsula, part of the Gulf of Mexico ( and arguably, some of Central America), and extends up to the Bering Strait and Arctic Circle. It could arguably include every U.S. state from New Mexico north to the Western provinces of Canada. Anything within about 200 miles out into the Pacific would be "within range" for such a claim.
That's a very large area, which of course includes the Pac. N.W. Given that there are regular 5.0 mag quakes in some of this area, you could safely conclude there will be a 6.0 mag quake in the region and you'd be within the 2.0 mag. +/- range for a "hit."
Pick a couple of spots on the "Ring of Fire" and do the same -- you are now practically guaranteed accurate "predictions" with which to amaze your friends.
Good luck in the Pac. N.W. during the next full or new moon, by the way.
Originally posted by g146541
Is there some source for all of these ...."predictions"?
Something that is dated before said quakes?
All i see is things dated after said happenings.
Originally posted by Discotech
reply to post by hp1229
Wouldn't say it was a successful prediction unlike the OP of this thread. He got the date wrong by a year, if that's your standard for accuracy though then fair enough!
To the OP keep those predictions coming will be interesting to see if it's not just coincedence or luck that you've got the right areas and dates 4 for 4 is good but lets see if you can get 10 for 10!
Originally posted by Drew99GT
Originally posted by g146541
Is there some source for all of these ...."predictions"?
Something that is dated before said quakes?
All i see is things dated after said happenings.
Yup! Dutchsinse does the same thing. I mean FFS people, at least document the dates of these weather and earthquake predictors, when they make a prediction, and when an event actually occurs. When you do, you'll find that they're LIARS and FRAUDS.
Originally posted by Thermo Klein
I am REALLY wondering why this thread hasn't taken off...
Are we so tied to presentation and thread title that we don't pay attention to fact?
Are we unfamiliar with the source so ignore the data?
Is it so accurate it's unbelievable?
Is it just vague enough to throw everyone off?
These were predictions published to a Google owned website, later found to be true:
Japan earthquake predicted as coast to coast disaster
Myanmar predicted as next earthquake, "it is time"
Fiji predicted
Indonesia predicted...
What's the problem here??
Originally posted by Drew99GT
Yup! Dutchsinse does the same thing. I mean FFS people, at least document the dates of these weather and earthquake predictors, when they make a prediction, and when an event actually occurs. When you do, you'll find that they're LIARS and FRAUDS.
Originally posted by hp1229
Thats why the thread would not take off. The predictions i'm sure are not based on some prophecy but factual data from the USGS or similar agencies which is funded by the tax payers
Originally posted by Thermo Klein
Originally posted by hp1229
Originally posted by Thermo Klein
I understand that believing in something "out there" is not comfortable. I'd recommend, instead of trying to debunk me with obviously ludicrous theories, you take a moment and ask yourself why you feel uncomfortable with it..
Originally posted by Thermo Klein
reply to post by Helgas2011
Even though I'm the channeler and the information has been pretty darn accurate I wouldn't trust chaneled information 100%. The beings who are providing the information do not experience time as we do, so it's just a tough thing to predict; one of the main reasons people don't trust channeling.
At this point I don't have any specific predictions. If I get one I'll reference this thread and the blog and make a large post of it. I might consider contacing local authorities as well.
Originally posted by hp1229
how did you come to conclusion that Myanmar was goig to be next? You made the prediction after the quake happened in japan. You obviously followed the science of earth quakes that you know very well and based on the fault lines, derived your predictions. There are several EQ softwares out there to do the same based on probability and track record of tremors within the earth's crust.
Channeling? hmmmm whatever.
Originally posted by Logical one
Question Thermo.
In the last 3 "predictions" you actually name the countries........but for the really big one, where thousands of lives were lost and the Earthquake being some 8,000 times bigger than the other 3 you "predicted".....you did not specify any particular country.
If the information you receive is actually made available for warning purposes then sadly it really didn't work too well with regards to the Japan quake..........why do you think this was the case Thermo?
The ocean floor will be splitting between the continents of North America and China region. This will cause much havoc and ocean levels rising temporarily. This sadly will cause the deaths of many but it is imperative that Earth cleanse herself of the sludge and chemical (destructive agents) that are causing her near demise. Gaia is a natural spiritual being and she will be protected at great, numerous costs as the desire to save her must be met.
Originally posted by avatar01
if 365 unique predictions are made per year, then one of them will be true.
How many people post predictions on the internet?
Originally posted by PaR3v
Do you have any more predictions for this month?