Well that sucks... but if it's all true there's not much you can do about it. Just prepare as best as you can for the worst, and hope as hard as you
can for the best. Maybe one of the "new land masses" will be reachable by boat from Florida, since the southeast is supposed to disappear first.
Hopefully they're all wrong about it, I know a lot of people who are near to panicking about 2012 and I'd kinda like to see them breath a big sigh
of relief when 2013 rolls around.
OK, so we have Cayce, Nostradamus, the Hopi, the Mayan and probably others and all are predicting something for 2012? Statistically, this 'seems'
significant- and a bit disconcerting.
Is there a list of 2012 predictors that are not 'johnny-come-lately's?
I don't know if EC actually said 2012 that will happen or this will do that... but good ol nos left us a book that illustrates the coming alignment
in 2012.... it's pretty cool... or bad or however you want to see it... i think this is the most interesting time to be alive tho....
edit on
4-4-2011 by 11azerus11 because: (no reason given)
edit on 4-4-2011 by 11azerus11 because: (no reason given)
those are interesting prophecies, but was the author of that article just fitting the predictions to the 2012 time frame, or did both Nos and Cayce
specifically mention 2012 as the year of these occurrences?
Well the thing is, the hopi do not mention a year, Nostradamus does not mention 2012, from what I have seen not many mention 2012 apart from the
mayans, I ching, and maybe the Egyptians. But was it them sending us a warning, or is it just someones idea of a good money making scheme and
fearmongering. Who knows.
Just to add to that Nostradamus apparently predicted after 2012, so its definetly not the end of the world according to him. Maybe a comet/asteroid
kicking all our arses or something, but nothiing more.
edit on 4-4-2011 by Redevilfan09 because: (no reason given)
I have some of the readings in that thread and in other of my posts... The inference that the readings mentioned 2012 is ONLY on the writers part and
not in the readings. Basically it seems the geophysical model that came from the Cayce readings, is what rings a bell with the writer on the OP link.
But the impression created by the title and article is false and should have been clarified by the writer.