It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The camera was also coated with a highly reflective silver coating that actually kept the film inside, of 200-212 exposures near room temperatures.
Those cameras at times spent a few hours in direct sunlight..
I read once that 'supposedly' They admitted to faking the pictures, that they are in such a rush to get things done up there that they didn't have time to take pics..
Originally posted by RobbWonder
I read once that 'supposedly' They admitted to faking the pictures, that they are in such a rush to get things done up there that they didn't have time to take pics..
Also funny how they don't have a live feed of the moon.. some might say data blah blah, but they have live feeds from all over the world...and they can't have ONE measly camera on the moon?
Or even on the space station. I think lots of people would watch, so i don't see any problem...
sorry i digress, just the subject got my mind ticking.
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by Illustronic
The camera was also coated with a highly reflective silver coating that actually kept the film inside, of 200-212 exposures near room temperatures.
Those cameras at times spent a few hours in direct sunlight..
Where can I buy some of that silver coating?
I'd like to paint my house..
Originally posted by RobbWonder
I read once that 'supposedly' They admitted to faking the pictures, that they are in such a rush to get things done up there that they didn't have time to take pics...
....so does a chromed bumber. Ever touch one when as it sits in the sun....
Originally posted by daddio
You do realize that is a bunch of crap. Silver would not keep the film "cool" at all. It does reflect light but so does a chromed bumber. Ever touch one when as it sits in the sun? I call major BS on this assumption. Illustronic, just give it up, we did not go to the moon, sad but true. It is far easier, with all the evidence at hand, to see that we could not have gone, than it is to "prove" we did go. Physics, math and everything else combined makes it a hoax that we went. Sorry, as you must be.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Originally posted by daddio
....so does a chromed bumber. Ever touch one when as it sits in the sun....
TRY THIS!!!!
That same chrome bumper? TOUCH THE OTHER SIDE!!!!
I mean, this is grade-school science. Reflectivity. Insulation. It isn't even counter-intuitive (as is much of the science of space....).
Originally posted by daddio...I have done the reseach, I just post stuff like that to see what new crazy ideas you all will come up with, the cameras don't matter to me, it's the math and the trajectory and the science of "thrusters in space"...