Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

In regards to "anonymous" hackers (False Flag warnings?)

page: 1
7

log in

join

posted on Apr, 3 2011 @ 08:14 PM
link   
I first want to say that i have been hesitant to make this thread mainly becasue i am unfamiliar with the source i will be quoting, thier credibillity, The group claiming to be "Anon" and the group that is possibly really Anon....

With that said what i am presenting should be researched and viewed from every angle by everyone who reads this to add light to all those involved,

As a long time ATS guest and recent addition to the ranks i have spent lots of time delving into older threads (as i hope many of the newer members do as well). Though i cannot locate or remember how i came across this particular file i can say that it was in regards to the 9-11 conspiracies. As i read through this article recently (about a month ago) i came across an interesting bit of information which what i hope to share with you all now.

The article i read was posted on corbettreport.com It involved a member of Alex Jones' site and some of the research that person had done in regards to 9-11.

As you can see the article was supposedly transcribed August 28th 2009 ( approx. 2 years 8 months ago)

throughout the article the interviewee tells the viewers how he was able to link certain details and people involved in those events, then at one point in the article he begins to talk about future False Flag events, that is where this thread comes in...Im going to quote some script now from this interview.


I think, and a lot of people would probably agree with me on this, the new world order probably didn't expect people around the world to have figured out their game. We understand their psyops. We have all their documents about psyops and how they're trying to manipulate us. And then we can ignore that and defeat that because we know the tools that they use. We know all of their tools and all of the little deceptive things that they use so they're no longer effective. And it's forcing them to have to go back to the drawing board. And one thing, this point I wanna mention, is that Booz-Allen Hamilton...There's a conference where Michael Chertoff, the former DHS Secretary, along with a guy named Andy Singer, who was a principal at Booz-Allen Hamilton...when you read between the lines, when you read what they're talking about, this is in reference to a global wargame drill that they ran modeling a global pandemic outbreak of avian flu...this is in 2006...with a cyber attack in conjunction with that. And what Andy Singer said was //paraphrasing// that we need to make sure that our next false flags are highly believable. We need to make sure that they appear to be so natural and have circumstances for a backdrop for these things that are gonna happen, that we're gonna cause, that they just follow a series of events that just seem like they'll get everyone to just believe that "Hey, there's actual hackers that did this.

The economy. With what's going on with the manufactured economic crisis. It's already being used. But that's going to be driven into the minds of the people into making them believe that there's these desperate people that are going to engage in cyber crime to try to mitigate their own circumstances in the financial crisis. And they may use that to sat that, "Well, there's homegrown terrorists that are retaliating against the government, against the Federal Reserve for stealing all these tens of trillions of dollars. And now we have to shut the internet down because..." There's a number of ways they could play that. But do you see where I'm going with that? If people educate themselves on what they're doing with all of this stuff, nobody will buy their bull."


So reading all this made me think of the recent publicity that Anonymous "seems" to be drawing to themselves which to me seems ridiculous for such a group, which makes me beleive (and im not making a prediction here) that perhaps all these people who are coming out as anonymous are trying to create just such an event as what was discussed.

I made this thread so that people could help me in several ways.
First i would love it someone could validate the site this was posted on "Corbittreport.com" and maybe even the individual who is being interviewed.
Also i would like to find what papers he was getting this information from so that it can be confirmed that this is actually "part of the plan" and finally i just want to make people aware of this so that perhaps we can prevent such a false flag from occuring

Thank you in advance for any participation you may take part in
edit on 3-4-2011 by RadicalRebel because: spellin...
edit on 3-4-2011 by RadicalRebel because: added info to title to better suit the intent of the thread




posted on Apr, 3 2011 @ 08:21 PM
link   
reply to post by RadicalRebel
 


I would like to thank one William "Bill" Cooper. his book, "Behold a Pale Horse" is mind shattering!! He revealed their game a long time ago & they tried their damnedest to stop him, but he succeeded. (& he mysteriously "killed himself" shortly after)

I suggest reading his book, or researching him. He is entirely credible & his sources are right from the "top secret" filing cabinet, so to say. xo



posted on Apr, 3 2011 @ 09:58 PM
link   
reply to post by AnitaCigarette
 


Thanks i did read some of what was on the link, not the book you mentioned but it was still good reading and i will probably read it all eventually (so much to read on this site), thx!



posted on Apr, 4 2011 @ 01:03 PM
link   
That is actually a brilliant plan. Not that I agree with it, but as far as the plan itself, that's a dam good one. I am surprised that there are not more comments on this thread.

I have never heard of the Corbett Report, and cannot personally help you to validate any of it, but I don't doubt it all. I just did an ATS search on Corbett Report. I skimmed over all 6 pages of results, reading each comment on the results page, and opened a couple threads on each page. Obviously not in depth research by me, but I did not see anything negative written about him. No statements claiming he was a fraud, not credible, etc.

So at this particular moment, I see no reason not to believe it, and I think you might be onto something here.



posted on Apr, 4 2011 @ 01:19 PM
link   
Well it's certainly an idea/theory as to why they went from targeting Scientology to hacking into HBGary accounts and making things personal around the time if the Assange arrest and Cablegate scandal of last year.

Then again, I know nothing other than what I read in the papers and online so I may have Anon completely wrong.



posted on Apr, 4 2011 @ 01:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by curious7
Then again, I know nothing other than what I read in the papers and online so I may have Anon completely wrong.

It is actually impossible for you to be wrong. If this was an actual group, then it would be possible. If these were actual people, then it would be possible. As it stands right now, it is not possible to have an incorrect opinion of any particular person or persons that call themselves anonymous, because they are hidden. They deny that there is a group. They deny that there is even a "they" at all. Anyone and everyone can be if they choose to be.

I have said this before, and I will say it again-
Anonymous is nothing more than it ever has been; a word for people to hide behind.

 
 

I will see if I can prove that here in just a minute.
Ok, I can't figure out how to do it. I saw someone posting last week. It was obvious it was the same poster as the OP, just by what he was saying. He was having some computer issues. Anyways, he was at 1st on his account, then he was on some sort of AnonymousATS account that had over 70,000 posts. I thought I could log out and comment under that user name, but obviously I don't know how.

My point still stands though. Anyone who wants to be anonymous is anonymous as long as nobody knows who they are. This in turn makes it impossible to have an invalid opinion of someone who does not actually exist.

This^^^^, is what makes the plan within the OP, even that much more of a brilliant plan.
edit on 4/4/11 by BrokenCircles because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 4 2011 @ 05:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by curious7
Well it's certainly an idea/theory as to why they went from targeting Scientology to hacking into HBGary accounts and making things personal around the time if the Assange arrest and Cablegate scandal of last year.

Then again, I know nothing other than what I read in the papers and online so I may have Anon completely wrong.


i have to agree with the above post...
But my concern is that there are now two groups, one being the underground hacker consortium of truly anonymous individuals loosly affiliated by techniques, ideas and intent...
Then there is this newer version of the old, with actual people, showing thier faces and names intentionally inciting protests and such in complete contradiction to the idea of being anonymous. Granted the general public would allow this to fly and not be able to see the distinction between the two...like good little sheep...

that WAS my take on it until you made your post, now i truly have to concider that there is only one group and has been all along....



posted on Apr, 4 2011 @ 05:35 PM
link   
reply to post by BrokenCircles
 


Yes i was hoping for some people to take part in this as well, if only to have the idea in thier head, its ok though, i havent had time to make an account in AJ's forums but i intend to so i can find the individual from this interview and see if i can get any copies of whatever reports/files he was reading from.

edit on 4-4-2011 by RadicalRebel because: spellin...



posted on Apr, 6 2011 @ 11:04 AM
link   
Just wanted to throw some newer info out there, these are articles about the current Anon attacks on Sony

This was the first article said to be released on monday
Anonymous vows war on Sony, strikes first blow
Then here is another article i read today,
Hacker group targets Sony executives, children

in the second article you can find the link to the story concerning the guy being sued
Rapping hacker raises legal funds to fight Sony

What i find funny about this suit against GeoHot, aka George Hotz, is that sony had once been the target of such lawsuits themselves,
Sony BMG copy protection rootkit scandal
regardless i can only imagine who will win in court...



posted on Jan, 24 2013 @ 12:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by AnitaCigarette
reply to post by RadicalRebel
 


I would like to thank one William "Bill" Cooper. his book, "Behold a Pale Horse" is mind shattering!! He revealed their game a long time ago & they tried their damnedest to stop him, but he succeeded. (& he mysteriously "killed himself" shortly after)

I suggest reading his book, or researching him. He is entirely credible & his sources are right from the "top secret" filing cabinet, so to say. xo



Milton William Cooper author of "Behold a Pale Horse" was shot by law enforcement and did not commit suicide...

OP apologies for going off topic.
edit on 24-1-2013 by abeverage because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 24 2013 @ 03:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by abeverage


Milton William Cooper author of "Behold a Pale Horse" was shot by law enforcement and did not commit suicide...

OP apologies for going off topic.
edit on 24-1-2013 by abeverage because: (no reason given)


Accepted though not neccessary. Concidering the overlaying topic is governmental lies and corruption i feel still on topic, but since its in two posts here now it would be appreciated if either of you could post some lnks for everyne else....thanks in advance.





new topics

top topics



 
7

log in

join