It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SammyB
reply to post by Curio
I certainly disagree, and yes, I believe they are able to hide the information. The MSM is complicit and they will do anything to protect the bottom line...money, stock market, etc.
Photos show that reactor 3 is basically destroyed. A hydrogen explosion would not have done that.
Thanks for making such a logical post, and case in point is Chernobyl.
Originally posted by Curio
OK, the MSM could hide it. What about about everybody else with Geiger counters? Twitter would be going nuts. People in Tokyo would probably be getting sick. Also, the radiation would have made it over here by now - where are the high readings (and I mean HIGH) that the network of "amateurs" are recording?
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
How would pressure forcibly eject the control rods?
Originally posted by Long Lance
4) with the core fully covered in (now pressurized) water, pressure goes off the scale (which may or may not go unnoticed, depending on the plant's condition) - and forcibly ejects the control rods.
any thoughts?
I thought the pressure would be equal in all directions, .
Originally posted by Long Lance
reply to post by Grifter.be
these are all above the surface and will produce a bright fireball and an initially glowing mushroom cloud.
the one i linked was at 190m below the surface, not too good either, but probably the closest we can get and voilà, the top portion looks quite similar while the arcing bits of debris are different, because they had to clear the crater, requiring at least a slight vertical component.
let me propose the following mechanism: sea water injection was said to have already commenced when the explosion occurred, so:
1) cover the (already damaged ?) core with water, which will keep it cool for a while at the expense of predictability, since the geometry of the core may have been compromised earlier due to overheating
2) sea water causes corrosion, especially at high temperatures, this won't affect the oxide pellets but steel parts will suffer very quickly, especially more delicate equipment like valves. buildup of precipitates at critical points will exacerbate the situation further.
3) pressure rises again, either quickly, due to material failure and unexpected recriticality or slowly from decay heat, but with some crucial valve(s) stuck on 'OMG!!'
______________
interjection: BWRs are operating with considerable voids in the core (steam bubbles) which means the core becomes progressively under moderated (moderation scales with density d'uh...) with height, so the top portion contributes relatively less to the chain reaction in normal operations. by contrast, PWRs don't have such voids and therefore tend to utilise the fuel more efficiently....
______________
4) with the core fully covered in (now pressurized) water, pressure goes off the scale (which may or may not go unnoticed, depending on the plant's condition) - and forcibly ejects the control rods.
5) with the loss of neutron absorbing control rods and underlying overmoderation (for a BWR), the reactor becomes prompt critical....
6) KABOOM
7) water is gone, so is an undetermined fraction of the core, no more chain reactions for now. unfortunately, decay heat is directly proportional to the power level at shutdown (aka: kaboom), ie. sky high, which explains the prominent plume emanating from the wreck immediately after the explosion.
any thoughts?
Yeah I looked at the drawings wearing my engineering hat but I don't see enough detail to be sure. I will say the small training nuclear reactor I toured when I took a course in nuclear engineering had the control rods on top, and if power was lost the control rods would fall into the core which seemed like a good safety measure to me, so of course when the control rods are underneath the core like at Fukushima I do have to wonder if that's as reliable in the event of a power loss. When nothing else works, gravity still seems to work.
Originally posted by Long Lance
all drawings i found indicate that control rods penetrate the reactor vessel, so there is a pressure differential it's just not clear to me whether it can grow large enough (combined with gravity, since BWRs insert from below) to eject the rods without failures of the drive systems.
www.ansn-jp.org...
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Does that pdf relate to the Fukushima plants? It looks too new. In fact on page 36 there's a schedule of hearings for 2011 regarding new nuclear plants in the IS.
Does anyone besides me think those hearings won't go too well since the Fukushima accident?
And reading about all those safety system backups in that pdf almost could make one think there's no way it can fail, but we know better.