It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The problem with this line of thought is that it uses "retaliation" alone as reason to classify something as an act of terror or not.
What we are saying is that Terry Jones committed an act of terrorism when he burned the Koran. He used the media in order to have people view this act of terrorism.
Terrorism-The deliberate commission of an act of violence to create an emotional response through the suffering of the victims in the furtherance of a political or social agenda; Violence against civilians to achieve military or political objectives
There was no violence to anyone else or threat of violence.........he burned a book..........thats not terrorism.....
You say "crashing planes" isnt terrorism.......lol ok so i guess you consider suicide bombers just blowing things up?
Originally posted by filosophia
If these Afghanistans care more about a book than civilians being killed in their country, including women and children, then their priorities are far off indeed, which makes me think this is all just propaganda. Show me some hard proof the koran burning in Florida caused a riot in Afghanistan. This should be fun.
Originally posted by whatukno
reply to post by ManBehindTheMask
There was no violence to anyone else or threat of violence.........he burned a book..........thats not terrorism.....
That's right, he BURNED a book which is a violent act.
Why did he burn the book? He didn't burn that book because he was cold, he didn't burn that book because he was illiterate and the book frustrated him. He burned it...
to create an emotional response through the suffering of the victims.
Those victims were the people who regard the Koran as holy.
While they definitely went WAY overboard in their reaction, you can't deny that they had an emotional response through their suffering.
Originally posted by whatukno
reply to post by ManBehindTheMask
There was no violence to anyone else or threat of violence.........he burned a book..........thats not terrorism.....
That's right, he BURNED a book which is a violent act.
Why did he burn the book? He didn't burn that book because he was cold, he didn't burn that book because he was illiterate and the book frustrated him. He burned it...
to create an emotional response through the suffering of the victims.
Those victims were the people who regard the Koran as holy.
While they definitely went WAY overboard in their reaction, you can't deny that they had an emotional response through their suffering.
Originally posted by whatukno
It seems that all you people coming to defend Terry Jones's actions are acting as if he was some sort of hero.
The truth is, that had he not burned the Koran, a violent act for the purpose of causing terror to Muslim people, the UN workers might still be alive.
But no, none of you will get that point, because you all appear to be so brainwashed and think that all Muslims are evil, and in your brainwashed minds, believe that anything bad to happen to a Muslim is a good thing.