Our Hearts and Brains Emit Energy Fields, page 10


Pages: <<  7    8    9    10  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 25 times


reply posted on 17-4-2011 @ 10:15 PM by sirnex
reply to post by bsbray11



Yeah, it's about EM fields. Maybe you don't realize you're talking to an electronics major too. I have known since the start of our discussion what an EM field is. I also happen to know that your link validates none of the garbage claims you made. So it's cute and all that you refuse to say which claim it's supposed to be a source for, but it's easy enough to see you're just trolling, as usual.


Clearly you didn't read the link. You're the troll with your ridiculous hands and arms argument.

So then you admit the obvious way in which the human mind factors into and interfaces with the experiments. They would not happen at all without the human mind. It is an enormously integral part of every experimental set-up.


Nope, the human mind does not detach from the brain and interfere with the setup of the experiment nor the physical processes nor is this a published aspect of the result.



reply posted on 18-4-2011 @ 04:21 AM by Jezus
Originally posted by sirnex
reply to
post by Jezus



Anyway the human mind does do the erasure


Nope, it does not directly erase anything as is clearly detailed in the quoted text provided earlier.


Your vague use of the word "directly" doesn't change anything.

A human mind designed, set up, and performed the experiment. It doesn't matter if the information is deleted by a computer....

And you keep ignoring the main issue, even if some how the information was accidentally deleted or deleted by something besides a human mind it doesn't change anything, that isn't the what proves the human mind is a factor.


reply posted on 18-4-2011 @ 04:24 PM by bsbray11
reply to post by Jezus



When Sirnex weasels in the word "directly" as if it means anything, he's ignoring the fact that EM fields do directly influence any other EM fields they interact with, as well as anything that in turn makes up that EM field in the first place.

That would be a direct physical connection.

Basically, as always, his argument reduces to argument from ignorance, which is a fallacy. "Fallacy" means his reasoning, is way off track, and not consequential to anything.


reply posted on 20-4-2011 @ 04:44 PM by Jezus
reply to post by bsbray11



Truthfully I don't think the issue is his intellectual ability to comprehend the science.

It is more a psychological reluctance to deal with such a dramatic contradiction between preconceived notions and the implications of the information.

Rationalization and denial isn't based on logic but on emotion.
Pages: <<  7    8    9    10  >>    ^^TOP^^



Hey You...Yeah, You...
  Posted 5 days ago with 82 member flags
Amazingly powerful video.. The real you - Alan Watts
  Posted 17 days ago with 50 member flags
Matrix Unraveled ~ The Do\'s and Do Not\'s ~ !!!!!!
  Posted 12 days ago with 49 member flags
I Did 3 Bowls Today – I’m Flyin !
  Posted 10 days ago with 42 member flags
Animals Are As With-it as Humans (Animals Are Conscious)
  Posted 16 days ago with 41 member flags
Spirit Science; a full movie
  Posted 5 days ago with 21 member flags