posted on Jul, 24 2004 @ 07:39 AM
Sounds like he donated it first hand (pun intended) instead of thru an agency , these twins were the result of one on one procreation instead of
anonomous insemination .
He could be lying , or she could be lying . If he "donated" by doing his business in a little plastic cup , and then left the building , that
is one thing .
If it happened thru consentual sex he should have got it in writing to cover his cajones , otherwise he is a parent by choice and should support the
financial aspect of raising the children . I would hope he is also given co-parenting rights instead of (taking his side for a moment) getting used
for financial support with no interaction allowed . That would be the biggest burn ever . The $$ support should actualy give him the right to at
least co-parent .
He should have a say in the rearing of these twins IMO .
It could have been an agreement that backfired when 2 costly little poopers entered the world , the woman may have been able to be a single parent
of one child sucessfully , but not 2 , and she may be lying . In wich case this guy got it stuck to him.
My sister has 2 wonderful children from an anonomous doner , and is a succesful single parent . She paid about 5000 bucks for enough sperm for 5
insemenations . missed the first time , got lucky on 2nd and 3rd , and has 2 more on ice if she wants to try again .
Completely anonomous , or a written contract are the only ways to go on this one .
And the stuff is expensive guys , so don't waste it ....