reply to post by Vitchilo
If this here is the case (roughly) with an overspend of 1.9 trillion...
787.6 billion in pensions.
898 billion in health care.
140.9 billion in education.
928.5 billion in defense.
464.6 billion in welfare.
57.3 billion in protective services.
104.2 billion in transportation.
29 billion in general government expenses.
151.4 billion in other spending.
Call this simple but why not just spread it over the nine areas and call it...
$1,900,000,000,000
/
9
= $2,111,111,111,11
This would mean cutting each area by around 200 billion, which cannot be done but if you take each percentage of expenditure and use that expenditure
to calculate cuts accordingly...
Roughly 1% of each of the 9 sections of the budget = $35.615 Billion
787.6 billion in pensions. = 22.1%
898 billion in health care. = 25.2%
140.9 billion in education. = 4.0%
928.5 billion in defense. = 26.0%
464.6 billion in welfare. = 13.0%
57.3 billion in protective services. = 1.6%
104.2 billion in transportation. = 3.0%
29 billion in general government expenses. = 0.9%
151.4 billion in other spending. = 4.2%
= 100% (rounded the figures off accordingly)
Here's what a balanced budget should look like with the same levels of spending in each area based on current expenditure with 1.9 trillion of savings
taken off the current expenditure...
367.2 Billion in pensions
418.7 Billion in pensions
66.5 Billion in education
433.0 billion in defence
216 billion in welfare
26.6 billion in protective services
49.8 billion in transportation
1.49 billion in general government spending
6.98 billion in other spending
Total expenditure = $1.66 trillion
At least this how I read it if it were to be reduced to a break even point which would probably be a breaking point for the people if this were to be
done.
edit on 12-7-2011 by XXXN3O because: (no reason given)