It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by kid_cudi
reply to post by jameshawkings
It wouldn't matter even if they did cause one because it wouldn't have enough energy to do any damage.
Now if you would have said HAARP is being aimed at a nuclear plant in the U.K. Then there would be a very good chance they were engineering an earthquake but they aren't so we have nothing to be scared of or worried about!edit on 1-4-2011 by kid_cudi because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Evanzsayz
reply to post by jameshawkings
So major EQ's cant happen in europe ok ill have to note that up lol
Originally posted by PrinceDreamer
There have been drilling rigs of the coast of Blackpool for years, they have been drilling their for gas for many many years now. That supply is running low and so they are looking to shale drilling for a new supply.
Whilst I have my doubts about shale drilling, it is a huge step to connect that to a tsunami on the NW coast of England, especially considering the geology there doesn't support tsunamis, well not unless your going to drop the east coast of Ireland in to the sea
This means that the power of the tsunami along that shoreline was about 1.3 *10^12, or 1.3 petawatts. To get energy, we need to know the duration of the tsunami. Let's estimate 100-1000 seconds. This means that the total energy was at least 1.3 * 10^14 joules, or 31 kilotons, equivalent to the 36 (15+21) kt that destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki, combined. If the duration was on the long end of these estimates, or the waves higher, this number could easily be 310 or even 3100 kilotons, equal to 10 or 100 Hiroshima's and Nagasaki's. My "gut feeling" from looking at the number of completely devastated cities is that these higher numbers are very likely.
Originally posted by Dock9
Sydney, as most are aware, is also situated on the ocean's edge and the Lucas Heights nuclear reactors are located approx. 40 kilometres from Sydney CBD.
www.ccsa.asn.au...
edit on 1-4-2011 by Dock9 because: spelling
Originally posted by clintdelicious
reply to post by jameshawkings
I think everyones problem is that you dont appear to be presenting any evidence to base these claims on. Just saying something like people can accept what the evidence points to or they can look at a darker, more sinister POV doesnt convince anyone. Unfortunately people need facts and evidence. Just saying something doesnt make it so im afraid.
Originally posted by Discotech
reply to post by jameshawkings
Plant explosives ?
They would need a nuke to cause it
This means that the power of the tsunami along that shoreline was about 1.3 *10^12, or 1.3 petawatts. To get energy, we need to know the duration of the tsunami. Let's estimate 100-1000 seconds. This means that the total energy was at least 1.3 * 10^14 joules, or 31 kilotons, equivalent to the 36 (15+21) kt that destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki, combined. If the duration was on the long end of these estimates, or the waves higher, this number could easily be 310 or even 3100 kilotons, equal to 10 or 100 Hiroshima's and Nagasaki's. My "gut feeling" from looking at the number of completely devastated cities is that these higher numbers are very likely.
www.geologyinmotion.com...
Do you not see how this is absurd ?
Originally posted by Discotech
reply to post by jameshawkings
Why would they do that ?
This is what I don't get about your conspiracy why go to such great lengths to cover all this up when we'll be dead so won't be able to moan about our evil government killing us anyway ?
Surely it would make better sense to just drop the nuke straight on top of us instead of going to costly and extravagant ways of killing us ?
Better yet why not just poison us all ?
This is what I mean about conspiracy theories going beyond the realms of logic and into fantasy!
Originally posted by Discotech
reply to post by jameshawkings
Why would they do that ?
This is what I don't get about your conspiracy why go to such great lengths to cover all this up when we'll be dead so won't be able to moan about our evil government killing us anyway ?
Surely it would make better sense to just drop the nuke straight on top of us instead of going to costly and extravagant ways of killing us ?
Better yet why not just poison us all ?
This is what I mean about conspiracy theories going beyond the realms of logic and into fantasy!
Originally posted by jameshawkings
Originally posted by Discotech
reply to post by jameshawkings
Why would they do that ?
This is what I don't get about your conspiracy why go to such great lengths to cover all this up when we'll be dead so won't be able to moan about our evil government killing us anyway ?
Surely it would make better sense to just drop the nuke straight on top of us instead of going to costly and extravagant ways of killing us ?
Better yet why not just poison us all ?
This is what I mean about conspiracy theories going beyond the realms of logic and into fantasy!
Discotech,
They are writing history, they need to write a history that leaves them as the heros, they need the people to follow them. They are commiting mass murder, genocide, they cannot risk us finding out and coming after them. They are very smooth and smart in the way they work.
Dropping a nuke right on us gives the game away. They need survivors here, they don't want to throw the baby out with the bath water, so they need the survivors to be with them and do as they say, to think the UN/NWO are a power for good. If there are no survivors the elite stop living like kings. They do need us, but they don't want so many. It's in their own quotes and speeches, research it for yourself. I know it's not nice, I've been there too.
Here's David Rockefeller himself admitting what he wants
This would all help the Elite's depopulation agenda and create a crisis big enough bring in the New World Order (when combined with many other similar plans they have around the world)
Originally posted by Dajjal
On the subject of earthquakes here in the UK, someone mentioned that the UK does not get much earthquake activity, cant rember which post or who, its a long thread, and I am tired, lol