Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Anti Gravity Acheived And Confirmed

page: 17
12
<< 14  15  16    18  19 >>

log in

join

posted on Sep, 17 2012 @ 05:54 AM
link   
WoW The Engineering Fair was enormous.
My AG Tech was quite well recd. with a great deal of surprise.
Though Higgs Boson was mentioned several times, to which I pointed
out that if Cern is right , then I am wrong, but I know that I am not wrong
and hence Higgs Boson cannot Exist, so cern is in error




posted on Feb, 23 2013 @ 08:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by ballsdeep
Come on mate it's 4.15pm I knock off in an hour, I'm exhausted and I see 'AG CONFIRMED AND TESTED'.. suddenly I'm ripe with vigour only to find some guy saying he lifted a tomato...



The thread was worth visiting purely for this. Cheers!



posted on Feb, 23 2013 @ 11:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by yoursteppingonmytoes

The thread was worth visiting purely for this. Cheers!



Lol nice user name, and you became a member just to post this?



posted on Sep, 4 2013 @ 09:01 PM
link   
Hi all

As much as I agree that there is not proper methodology, evidence -not even in the form of a video that could have been edited-FX- not a single equation-math to bind any of the findings-experiments of Savvy, taking into account the kind of forum we are, in which we indulge testimonies, data, theories that are at least as "thin" as any of the claims by Savvy, I think we should all have to accept the following:

We only know and work with a subset of the original Maxwell theory on EM.
We still are trying to figure out if Einstein really had it right... from the concept of "speed of light" as an absolute value & truth, we jumped to the "mhhh there maybe exceptions to that" to our current time where there is empirical data that shows us the speed of light is not that red line we thought was impossible to cross.
I mean to say, we assume more than we know, and the weight-inertia of our assumptions makes it even harder for all of us to have an open mind to accept and understand new data.
If I was Savvy, I wouldnt even tell about my discovery to my wife. Of course I wouldnt publish any maths, schematics or hard data as this would unleash all the scientific community paid by special interest groups to debunk me, and after being forced to engage into the debate and opening my data... to be found dead... suicide... accidents, sudden terminal illness...you all know that TPTB have killed people for information less threating regarding science, politics or social movements.
Another grain of salt: If Nick Pope would have posted something like "I can tell you that Livermore Labs developed a Unified theory of everything after reverse engineering the ufo sports model in area 51 thanks to the work of Bob Lazar, and we discovered that Einstein was wrong but I cant give more specifics due to my blahblahblah security clearance" we would have thought "wow that has to be soooo truth"...

Dont shoot the messanger when you dont like (or understand) the message.

(That said, the Carlos Mencia that lives in me is shouting ""BULLLL#TTTT" )


Keep us posted Savvy! If there is a gram of truth in any of the things you say, you may have the only solution to save us from MAD.

Namaste



posted on Sep, 25 2013 @ 09:52 PM
link   
reply to post by Quaternion
 

Lol, amazing deception. So you signed up, just to post this?

BTW Folks,
As I put my demo version of my AG Machine, which is slated for a press conference
and/or a unveiling ceremony of sorts, thru its paces, a noteworthy result to
share at this juncture, would be :
2 candles lit and one placed in the AG environment. The one in the AG environment,
burned brighter and went out 17 minutes b4 the other one.
So now you know why the clocks on the orbiting sats and spacecrafts run faster.



posted on Sep, 25 2013 @ 11:04 PM
link   
reply to post by Angelic Resurrection
 


Because the quality of wax varies between 2 candles?



posted on Sep, 25 2013 @ 11:31 PM
link   

Angelic Resurrection
reply to post by Quaternion
 


So now you know why the clocks on the orbiting sats and spacecrafts run faster.



I was always told the reason for this is because they are higher up. Clocks that are higher up run faster.

Minute physics has a better explanation.




posted on Sep, 25 2013 @ 11:45 PM
link   

gr1ill3d

Angelic Resurrection
reply to post by Quaternion
 


So now you know why the clocks on the orbiting sats and spacecrafts run faster.



I was always told the reason for this is because they are higher up. Clocks that are higher up run faster.

Minute physics has a better explanation.



What you were told is erroneous, just as minute physics is wrong



posted on Sep, 26 2013 @ 12:03 AM
link   
all I have read and understood from you so far is that everyone else is wrong and you are absolutely right.
you haven't shown any proof of anything. just jibber-jabber and yet your title still says CONFIRMED.

funny how this thread is 2 years old and still only has 11 flags eh?

anywho, no i did not sign up just to post this as you've asked many others.



posted on Sep, 26 2013 @ 12:56 AM
link   
reply to post by Chickensalad
 

Lol, welcome to skunk works. but honestly I don't recall seeing your mug anywhere on ats before.
but you may look up my posts elsewhere, if you so wish



posted on Sep, 26 2013 @ 03:56 PM
link   

Aloysius the Gaul
reply to post by Angelic Resurrection
 


Because the quality of wax varies between 2 candles?


No my friend, 2 identical candles in every way



posted on Sep, 26 2013 @ 04:19 PM
link   
reply to post by Angelic Resurrection
 


So... Einstein was wrong too?


I can't wait for the press conference. When is it scheduled for?



posted on Sep, 26 2013 @ 05:17 PM
link   

Blarneystoner
reply to post by Angelic Resurrection
 


So... Einstein was wrong too?


I can't wait for the press conference. When is it scheduled for?


Yes you have that right. Einstein was wrong after all
The press conference and/or a unveiling ceremony,
hopefully within 20 to 30 days.



posted on Sep, 26 2013 @ 05:32 PM
link   

Angelic Resurrection

Aloysius the Gaul
reply to post by Angelic Resurrection
 


Because the quality of wax varies between 2 candles?


No my friend, 2 identical candles in every way


no - they were not identical - no 2 items are ever identical in every way even if manufactured side by side.

You saying they were is just more evidence you are not actually capable of meaningful information.

20-30 days for something? I've got it calendared for follow-up......



posted on Sep, 26 2013 @ 06:43 PM
link   
reply to post by Angelic Resurrection
 




So minutephysics a guy who is a physicist, is wrong? So was Einstein? Those are some serious accusations. Do you by chance have something to show how they are wrong? Cause if you don't then you are wrong. No matter what you say in this thread beyond this point is wrong.



posted on Sep, 27 2013 @ 01:49 AM
link   

gr1ill3d
reply to post by Angelic Resurrection
 




So minutephysics a guy who is a physicist, is wrong? So was Einstein? Those are some serious accusations. Do you by chance have something to show how they are wrong?

Just as your professor at college, I wont be spelling out every thing.
Do it as your homework.

Cause if you don't then you are wrong. No matter what you say in this thread beyond this point is wrong.
Famous last words, seems like you are working to someone agenda.
But instead , while I am putting this AG machine thru its paces, suggest some experiments for
the AG environment. In fact Ya'll can suggest and in a way participate in this stage



posted on Sep, 27 2013 @ 01:44 PM
link   

Aloysius the Gaul


no - they were not identical - no 2 items are ever identical in every way even if manufactured side by side.




Lol, what a joke



posted on Nov, 4 2013 @ 06:45 AM
link   

Quaternion


(That said, the Carlos Mencia that lives in me is shouting ""BULLLL#TTTT" )


Keep us posted Savvy! If there is a gram of truth in any of the things you say, you may have the only solution to save us from MAD.



Sorry can't get past the DoD

Go Figure














posted on Nov, 4 2013 @ 11:50 AM
link   
This thread is two years old now and so far no evidence of the AG device has been put forth.

I'm wondering why this thread hasn't been put in the Hoax bin where it belongs.

Tired of the excuses. Time to put an end to this foolishness.



posted on Nov, 4 2013 @ 12:06 PM
link   
Hmmmm.....no big press conferences that I have seen...

Or wait...did I miss the HUGE unveiling of AG somewhere? LOL!

OP - You have had AMPLE time to patent your AG machine at this point so you should either post it or most will continue to call you on your BS and lies. And the "I don't have the money to get a patent" excuse won't work because you would have NUMEROUS investors at this point throwing money at you....not the least of which would be every government in the world.





new topics

top topics



 
12
<< 14  15  16    18  19 >>

log in

join