Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
Originally posted by 1010011010
I am going in circles? Okay. You are unable to provide the simplest answers and obviously don't know what you are talking about. I gave you the chance
to explain your results and you failed miserably; you weren't even able to answer the simplest questions other users and I have posted (like what the
"Savvy vector" actually is. And no, your report doesn't define it anywhere).
I did warn you
You have, yes, but I was trying to make him see the lack of evidence, common sense and understanding he was and still is showing (or not showing if we
are talking about evidence).
There is no reasoning with this man. I'm out.
EDIT: In addition, the "report" is so poorly written and full of grammatical errors that no one can understand what it says. No wonder the "high
profile scientist" or whatever you call them never showed up.
edit on 8-3-2012 by 1010011010 because: (no reason given)