Anti Gravity Acheived And Confirmed, page 14

Pages: << 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 10 times

reply posted on 8-3-2012 @ 04:54 AM by Angelic Resurrection

reply to post by 1010011010

You are entitled to your opinion, however dubious and derive satisfaction thereof.

To Hyper
To date list any reputed science journal that has published anything on AG or Ufo drives.
You onbiously have no experience in sending any material to a science journal for publication.

reply posted on 8-3-2012 @ 06:55 AM by hypervalentiodine

reply to post by Angelic Resurrection

Actually I do. And there aren't any because, as I said, it's crackpottery and not real science.

reply posted on 8-3-2012 @ 09:10 AM by 1010011010

Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul

Originally posted by 1010011010

I am going in circles? Okay. You are unable to provide the simplest answers and obviously don't know what you are talking about. I gave you the chance to explain your results and you failed miserably; you weren't even able to answer the simplest questions other users and I have posted (like what the "Savvy vector" actually is. And no, your report doesn't define it anywhere).

I did warn you

You have, yes, but I was trying to make him see the lack of evidence, common sense and understanding he was and still is showing (or not showing if we are talking about evidence).

There is no reasoning with this man. I'm out.

EDIT: In addition, the "report" is so poorly written and full of grammatical errors that no one can understand what it says. No wonder the "high profile scientist" or whatever you call them never showed up.

edit on 8-3-2012 by 1010011010 because: (no reason given)

reply posted on 8-3-2012 @ 01:48 PM by Angelic Resurrection

Originally posted by hypervalentiodine
reply to post by Angelic Resurrection

Actually I do. And there aren't any because, as I said, it's crackpottery and not real science.

So is that why Drs Ning Li and Evgeny podkletnov have since disappeared?

reply posted on 8-3-2012 @ 02:20 PM by Aloysius the Gaul

Originally posted by 1010011010
[ I was trying to make him see the lack of evidence, common sense and understanding he was and still is showing (or not showing if we are talking about evidence).

Yep - I could see the effort & lengths you went to & unlike him I applaud your logical conclusion!

reply posted on 8-3-2012 @ 02:28 PM by Aloysius the Gaul

Originally posted by Angelic Resurrection

Originally posted by hypervalentiodine
reply to post by Angelic Resurrection

Actually I do. And there aren't any because, as I said, it's crackpottery and not real science.

So is that why Drs Ning Li and Evgeny podkletnov have since disappeared?

No - they have "disappeared" because no-one wants to employ them any more, so they do not get published nor maintain any 'net presence.

they are quacks - just like you - only they were in "the establishment", which rejected their quackery.

reply posted on 9-3-2012 @ 04:15 AM by Angelic Resurrection

Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul

Originally posted by 1010011010
[ I was trying to make him see the lack of evidence, common sense and understanding he was and still is showing (or not showing if we are talking about evidence).

Yep - I could see the effort & lengths you went to & unlike him I applaud your logical conclusion!

Lol. Then I wonder if both of your credentials invividually or even put together would amount to much.
Ah well, nvm you get all kinds on ats

reply posted on 9-3-2012 @ 04:58 AM by hypervalentiodine

reply to post by Angelic Resurrection

Whether they have credentials or not has nothing to do with how silly the concept of AG is.

It's also a wrong and fallacious way to start holding a debate.

edit on 9-3-2012 by hypervalentiodine because: (no reason given)

reply posted on 10-3-2012 @ 05:26 AM by Angelic Resurrection

reply to post by hypervalentiodine

Oh Yeah. Since when has a fully working technology, that will change the world as you know it, become a silly concept?

reply posted on 10-3-2012 @ 06:11 AM by hypervalentiodine

Originally posted by Angelic Resurrection
reply to post by hypervalentiodine

Oh Yeah. Since when has a fully working technology, that will change the world as you know it, become a silly concept?

You're presenting a straw man. I did not say anything about world-altering technologies, I simply said that anti-gravity machines are founded on quack science.

reply posted on 10-3-2012 @ 06:52 AM by moonrunner

reply posted on 10-3-2012 @ 06:18 PM by Aloysius the Gaul

Originally posted by Angelic Resurrection
reply to post by hypervalentiodine

Oh Yeah. Since when has a fully working technology, that will change the world as you know it, become a silly concept?

Never.

since when did you have any of it?

reply posted on 10-3-2012 @ 06:22 PM by Aloysius the Gaul

Originally posted by Angelic Resurrection

Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul

Originally posted by 1010011010
[ I was trying to make him see the lack of evidence, common sense and understanding he was and still is showing (or not showing if we are talking about evidence).

Yep - I could see the effort & lengths you went to & unlike him I applaud your logical conclusion!

Lol. Then I wonder if both of your credentials invividually or even put together would amount to much.

Ah - a snide little argument from authority.

I wonder what you credentials amount to then, to come here claiming to have anti-gravity and persistently refusing to provide a single piece of evidence?

What are you credentials?

Ah well, nvm you get all kinds on ats

Yep - unfortunately for you some of us can think critically - which requires no credentials at all.

Making wild claims with no evidence also requires no credentials, but is less useful.

reply posted on 11-3-2012 @ 05:24 AM by Angelic Resurrection

reply to post by hypervalentiodine

I was refering to my AG science and tech.
Yes unfortunately the mainstream will dub anything that brings Einstein;s hypotheses in
questionable light, as quack science.

reply posted on 11-3-2012 @ 05:46 AM by hypervalentiodine

reply to post by Angelic Resurrection

That's generally because it is.

reply posted on 12-3-2012 @ 05:11 AM by Angelic Resurrection

reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul

Good God people, are you all blind to the visible evidence provided,
which even corroborates electronic, optical and mechanical measurements?
The calibre of people on ats is truly pathetic, to say the least.

reply posted on 12-3-2012 @ 05:26 AM by hypervalentiodine

reply to post by Angelic Resurrection

In 14 pages, I am yet to see any credible evidence. Are you holding back on us? I mean, if you have actual evidence, you should share it. Though I dare say that ATS is not the place to gain insightful feedback for this sort of thing. Try your idea out on scientists by posting it in a science forum. If you have anything even half way credible, I'm sure it will stand up to their questioning.

reply posted on 12-3-2012 @ 08:35 PM by JJRichey

reply to post by hypervalentiodine

He HAS posted in engineering and science forums, and was laughed out as the crackpot he is.

Thats why he came here.

Seriously people, stop feeding the troll and let this thread die a glourious death.

edit on 12-3-2012 by JJRichey because: spelling error, because English actually IS my native language!

reply posted on 12-3-2012 @ 09:04 PM by Aloysius the Gaul

Originally posted by Angelic Resurrection
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul

Good God people, are you all blind to the visible evidence provided,
which even corroborates electronic, optical and mechanical measurements?
The calibre of people on ats is truly pathetic, to say the least.

You have specifically and repeatedly said that you do NOT provide evidence at all - you have point blank said that you DELIBERATELY did not make a video and will not post photographs.

the only "evidence" you have provided is you saying this thing exists - you have never provided any link to ANY corroborating evidence of any kind, or even quoted any "electronic, optical and mechanical measurements".

So yes, the calibre here on ATS is indeed pathetic - but if you left that would improve somewhat!

reply posted on 13-3-2012 @ 06:22 AM by Angelic Resurrection