posted on Apr, 1 2011 @ 08:33 AM
Originally posted by squandered
Originally posted by PrinceDreamer
I have always suspected HIV was a manufactured virus, coded to specifically attack African people, and if you look at the infection rates in Africa
they dwarf everywhere else, I know the virus started there, but the expected pandemics in the west never happened, there was infection but the numbers
settled more. Yet in Africa it just keeps getting worse and worse.
If this is a HIV mark 2 I feel really sorry for the Chinese people a sad development and quiet worrying
The fact that so many suffer from AIDS in Africa and India has everything to do with men not practising safe sex. You can blame a lack of education
and a culture that shuns protection. In Africa's case they still blame bad spirits. I think the obvious reasons are good enough.
Would you say it's also manufactured for gay men, because anal sex is a great transmitter of the disease?
You see my logic.
Yeah I see your logic, though I find it some what flawed
Firstly it affects gay men more because anal sex does pose a greater risk, there if a far
greater risk of tearing inside the anus as opposed to inside the vagina allowing bodily fluid to enter the blood stream and increasing the risk to
If your facts about unprotected sex was valid, then why are the major catholic countries like those of south American not at the same high levels? Why
has India (which you wrongly stated is high like Africa) not got the same high levels?
Look at this chart at area contamination from the end of 2009, notice the Sub-Saharan Africa (predominately black area) has a 5% infection rate, North
Africa and the middle east (predominately Arab) has a 0.2% infection rate, in fact you don't get higher than 0.5% infection ANYWHERE except for Africa
or the Caribbean (predominately black though not to the extent of Africa) which has a 1% infection rate
The evidence would suggest to me that black people are more susceptible to infection from HIV, and my belief is or at least I suspect it was
genetically engineered to be that way. These are of course just my opinions and do not constitute proof, but the question must be asked why does it
affect black people to a greater degree than any other race? Considering teh amount of unwanted teenage pregnancies I see in my own country (the UK)
which is a strong indicator of unprotected sex, it should be rampant here to, yet it is not.
It would be nice to see a study indicating the infection rate among races, rather than just area. That would give a clearer picture, until then it
remains a supposition and guess work, but I think my logic is fairly sound
edit on 1-4-2011 by PrinceDreamer because: (no reason given)