Ask An Astronomer About Nibiru (Planet X, Tyche, etc.) HERE!, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 104 times


reply posted on 31-3-2011 @ 06:22 PM by allprowolfy
reply to post by OldCorp

two telescopes - one a 23" refracting telescope

My question to you op do these refracting telescopes have an ability to see behind the sun during the day-with an avid sunlens?

As this seems to be the argument thus far, a second star-planet- that cannot be seen because it is right behind the sun-usually during the day?


my regards


reply posted on 31-3-2011 @ 06:57 PM by OldCorp
Originally posted by allprowolfy
reply to post by OldCorp

two telescopes - one a 23" refracting telescope

My question to you op do these refracting telescopes have an ability to see behind the sun during the day-with an avid sunlens?

As this seems to be the argument thus far, a second star-planet- that cannot be seen because it is right behind the sun-usually during the day?

my regards


As far as I know, no Earth-based optical imaging system can see THROUGH the Sun. However, I have been to this observatory with my kids in the past and I have watched the live video that the solar telescope captures - it is VERY detailed - so if there is anything just off to the sides of the Sun, I'm sure it will be visible. I think this will be useful to explain the "second Sun" that people have been recording, as the telescope will be able to rule out "Sun Dogs."

One thing I'm going to ask him for sure, is to explain things like this:




I'm NOT saying these are alien craft - yet; but I don't buy the "speck on the lens" or "artifact" explanations NeverAStraightAnswer has been feeding us. If these images were specks of dust, they would be visible in ALL of the Stereo images, and in ALL wavelengths; but they aren't.

We shall see what the man has to say.

Thanks.


reply posted on 31-3-2011 @ 09:07 PM by PorroAgoVetusRespublica
reply to post by OldCorp


How long does he think humanity has before an extinction-level event might occur?


reply posted on 31-3-2011 @ 10:44 PM by OldCorp
Originally posted by new_here
Greetings, fellow South Carolinian!!!
I have a thought-- it has to do with the strange area on Google Sky that many say is tampered with in order to hide something. I will look for the coordinates tomorrow, or someone may have them handy. I looked at the area myself, and it does seem, for the world, like somebody did a shoddy job of image editing! (You can actually see a glowing portion of a heavenly body shining from behind a blurry square.)

So, here's the plan... even though this area of space might not be viewable from there, just 'play dumb' and act like you're throwing out random coordinates. He'll let you know if it's not viewable. BUT, before he says anything... the moment you name the coordinates... watch his reaction carefully. Watch his eyes. Watch for any sign of an "oh sh*t" moment, such as breaking eye contact with you before answering, face flushing, change in speech pattern (such as stumbling over words, speaking more rapidly, etc.)

AND... when he does answer, watch where his eyes go. Studies indicate that when someone is making something up, they tend to focus their eyes up and to their right (as opposed to recounting a memory in which they look up and to their left.)

What do you think? Worth a shot?


My dear Sand-Lapper,

I'm going to have TWO cameras on the man. If he lies, looks up and to the right, or develops the slightest bit of flop sweat, we'll see it. Cal Lightman would be proud.


edit on 3/31/2011 by OldCorp because: (no reason given)


reply posted on 31-3-2011 @ 10:48 PM by Nobama
reply to post by Feltrick


Why would they use chemtrails to hide it? I thought this was a brown dwarf star that absorbs light thus making it invisible? lol.. Seriously though this sounds interesting S+F



reply posted on 31-3-2011 @ 11:02 PM by grindhouzer
reply to post by psychoacoustic1


Im in New Zealand, and I have a Pretty good telescope..

care to let me know were to look?


reply posted on 31-3-2011 @ 11:26 PM by BlastedCaddy
reply to post by OldCorp


Pretty cool opp OC... I don't know if it is possible but if you do locate Nibiru are there going to be pics?
edit on 31-3-2011 by BlastedCaddy because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 31-3-2011 @ 11:31 PM by OldCorp
Originally posted by BlastedCaddy
reply to post by OldCorp


Pretty cool opp OC... I don't know if it is possible but if you do locate Nibiru are there going to be pics?
edit on 31-3-2011 by BlastedCaddy because: (no reason given)


I will upload HD video of WHATEVER I find (or don't find.)


reply posted on 31-3-2011 @ 11:50 PM by itscocobaby
reply to post by OldCorp


First off SnF for you! And I have a question about some verbiage on the ssd.jpl.nasa.gov...

From NASA's Ephemeris page here is a partial list to see the entire page use the "generate ephemeris" button

Center pole/equ : High-precision EOP model {East-longitude +}
Center radii : 6378.1 x 6378.1 x 6356.8 km {Equator, meridian, pole}
Target primary : Sun {source: DE405}
Interfering body : MOON (Req= 1737.400) km {source: DE405}
Deflecting body : Sun, EARTH {source: DE405}
Deflecting GMs : 1.3271E+11, 3.9860E+05 km^3/s^2
Small perturbers : Ceres, Pallas, Vesta {source: SB405-CPV-2}
Small body GMs : 6.32E+01, 1.43E+01, 1.78E+01 km^3/s^2


Here's my question, What exactly does Interfering body mean? does that denote the comet will crash into the moon? We see that the deflecting bodies are the Sun/earth. Further down we see Small perturbers Ceres, Pallas and Vesta.
Ceres and Pallas are asteroids, but Vesta is a small planet.
You can read more about these heavenly bodies here: www.asi.org...

I didn't understand what "perturbers" were so I looked that up and it means:
Variation in a designated orbit, as of a planet, that results from the influence of one or more external bodies. Gravitational attraction between planets can cause perturbations and cause a planet to deviate from its expected orbit.

Link www.thefreedictionary.com...
So does this mean that Comet Elenin/planet x/Nibiru may have it's orbit or gravitational pull thrown off course in some way? And perhaps head straight for Earth? Can you please ask him to intrepret the text from NASA and tell us all exactly what that all means? Also please visit the link and print out the page and take it with you. Just a suggestion but it's a bunch of numbers and calculations that I'm sure he will understand and hopefully be able to explain.
Again thank you Sir for doing this, I hope it's productive, we know that the comet is real and have NASA's ephemeris to guide you with exact calculations. Cheers!
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



May 20/21, 2012: the true meaning.
  Posted 9 days ago with 25 member flags
Cool Eclipse pictures (Earth, Moon, Sun, Pleiades)
  Posted 8 days ago with 24 member flags
Why the 2012 Phenomenon is Real!
  Posted 11 days ago with 21 member flags
World Message: Beginning May 26 thru Dec 21
  Posted 10 days ago with 14 member flags
Nebula or Nibiru (May 28 2012)
  Posted 1 days ago with 13 member flags
newly discovered mayan calendars go beyond 2012
  Posted 18 days ago with 12 member flags
OMG: 2012 KP24 Incoming! Are we Doomed?
  Posted 4 days ago with 10 member flags
Secret rogue planet may be hiding behind Neptune
  Posted 14 days ago with 7 member flags