Wow ... I find it amazing that the OP gets an offer of help from a fellow ATS'er and all he can say is Buy my book....

Hopefully the OP will catch on to the hint given and do something to get his technology off the ground!

I truly want to see one of these technologies succeed!

Yes, sadly, it's been the same story countless times over my 4 years here on ATS.

Not saying the OP fits in any of these categories, but my experience of ATS FE posters are:

1. Armchair critic: won't lift a practical finger but happy to bash everyone else's efforts and claim the moral and intellectual high ground. Usually these guys are conventional to the core and thoroughly stuck in the box when it comes to anything they perceive as the domain of 'science'
2. Wanna-be inventor: claim they are going to do something, but actually never get off the keyboard!
3. Broke garage tinkerer: these guys do stuff, sometimes very cool, but they never seem to have the money or time to get anything working. Still, one day pretty soon now, they're gonna crack it and the patent will make them an overnight trillionaire
4. Delusional inventor: they've actually put the work in, have created something, but it doesn't quite work as they claim, even though they can't see that. Usually, they hide behind secrecy or they are waiting for patent approval before they'll share the details
5. FE cheer-leader: nothing of real substance to add, confused about most of the tech, no real distinctions in terminology, like to post lots of links to FE sites without actually reading or understanding the linked pages etc. Well intentioned but no significant contribution.
6. Open source, serious, motivated, funded inventor/tinkerer, more than happy to share their ideas and partner with like minded souls - oops no, haven't come across any of those on ATS to date

This is probably my final post on ATS but I will drop in occasionally to check U2U if someone out there feels they are closer to cat. 6 than the rest and are interested in some help and support in getting their idea out to the world and doing some serious good for humanity.

Ciao for now

Originally posted by Kalki11
I believe that the co-axial electret will allow for an EM scroll wave (a continuous phase transition from aetheric to electronic via electrostatic field) and autoelectronic emissions will continuously rectify.

a) what is this belief based on?
b) phase transition of what?
c) why is the "load" shorted on your diagram?

The reason I don't want help (as in one person giving me a bunch of $) is because I don't want to be accused of being a charlatan if I can't Tesla the thing, it may require an Edisonian approach to the unknowns. Money is less of an issue as finding the right partners and work space.

Originally posted by Kalki11

I don't s**t on others, I scour their work for any insights I may apply to my "ultimate" device, the one that somehow mimics creation itself - this is consistent, the concept of auto-electronic emissions, with all matter emerging from hyperspace/aether in a continual omnibang.

A noble thought. But how you gonna handle the high impedance
between the earth and the aether sink.

Good news, I have reached the conclusion that the aether sink is unnecessary because the negative resistance effectively "sinks" or implodes the Heaviside component into the Poynting component. A simpler circuit design, similar to the above rectenna circuit has been designed for negative resistance and self-oscillation. Also a man contacted me at work and is going to assist the prototyping, he's involved in the alt. energy scene here in Ithaca.