reply to post by Sanjur0
Dont you see Icke just collects evidence?
No I don't. If thats just what he was doing, we wouldn't be having this conversation
For example the moon theory ....
As far as anyone knows, the Zulu tales are just that, tales.
As far as these Russians that build the moon I am unfamiliar with, but I think the moon was around before Russia, though I'm too lazy to back that up
Just because our science can't explain every facet of the moon, doesn't mean there are no logical explanations to come, and does not prove the
validity of counter arguments. Because I can't explain the moon, does not conclude Icke is correct about his theories. However in all honesty, I'm not
too familiar with his moon 'work'. However I am positive I would have the same level of agreement with the works of his I have seen/read.
So think before you jump on something like an angry beast
Yes, I so angry! RAAWWWRRR! Really? So who's angry? And I never asked "why is he a fraud?" I believe I stated I believe him to be one.
this guy has no cash man, he needs to publish his books with the profit from his other books. He hardly gets around.
I skeet by life by the seat of my pants, I know I couldn't afford to publish my own book, and fund my own book tours, so I'm certain he's got more
cash than me. And I've seen his videos filmed in many locations, he definitely gets around. So, unless you're his banker, I believe you make these
claims based off assumption. Such as, assuming that DI telling you he is poor is both correct, and relative to your definition of poor.
Also, I too would have to publish my own work if everyone I tried to sell it to thought it was bunk.
Oh and on a side note, keep in mind.... The BEST cons, are based in half-truths.
edit on 31-3-2011 by Lighterside because: sidenote