It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


HAARP vs. Niburu

page: 1

log in


posted on Mar, 29 2011 @ 08:00 PM
If i were to decide which is more plausible:

Human beings manipulating the energy of the stratosphere through modern technology or

A comet which is purported to exist, and its signifance cant be made any more meaningful than other comets/asteroids (never mind the fanatics that say this comet is sitchins Niburu, which means they also support his botched interpretation of sumerian cuneiform, plus his appalling interpretation of what is simply metaphysical ideas) in outer space, i would have to say the former is much more believable, and logical given human nature.

Frankly, i think these "god men" are staging the apocalypse. Theyre starting wars, creating earthquakes, destructive hurricances, and who knows, maybe they'll unleash epedemics on us. If theyre going to play God, theyre going to go all the way.

Undoubtedly, this is much more believable than niburu.

Its amazing more people dont give more credence to this idea.

edit on 29-3-2011 by dontreally because: (no reason given)


log in