It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by EastCoastKid
If Bush gets elected, he will start the draft.
Originally posted by EastCoastKid
Duly noted, MM; however, when you consider the PNAC strategy for regime change in Syria and Iran... (not even mentioning N. Korea), a much different picture emerges.
to match its new missions
...John Kerry's plan will call on every American of every age and every background to serve.
A Kerry Administration will offer Americans the chance to earn the equivalent of their state's four-year public college tuition in exchange for two years of service.
Originally posted by EastCoastKid
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
......insecurity.....
Right.
Just answer the questions. It seems like it is you who is afraid.
What you have written proves my contention(s) beyond a shadow of a doubt. You're either a kid with no knowledge of this issue; or you're trying pitifully to mislead people. In order to do that, one must be in command of the FACTS.
He's actually more fiscally conservative and responsible than Bush has ever been.
Sadly, under this regime, the people do not have much of a say.
It was introduced for two reasons:
1. BushCo. wanted folks to think they've shot it down.
I'm a registered Republican.
He seems to be making the noises of a realist, and that is what is so badly needed right now.
More of this NeoCon Bu# is only gonna lead us into war with Syria and Iran.
One thing I do know is, if Bush is re-elected and what I said comes to pass, there will be no way around re-instituting a draft. It'll be universal (men & women both - which I strenuously oppose) and it will be up to the age of 35.
It's amazing to listen to young people rant on about how great Dubya Bush is.
Originally posted by Seekerof
Bush, Bush, and more Bush....
Always Bush this and Bush that...
As par, hey, its Bush's fault and even IF he does not get re-elected, when the Dems institute their own version of the draft--- I mean after-all, wasn't Kerry the one talking about adding troops and troop levels
Seekerof:
This idea or conception of Mr. Kerry's means sending more troops to Iraq/Afghanistan:
Kerry says he would send more troops to Iraq if necessary
Seekerof:
Here's Mr. Kerry on record:
...John Kerry's plan will call on every American of every age and every background to serve.
Mr. Kerry further stipulates:
A Kerry Administration will offer Americans the chance to earn the equivalent of their state's four-year public college tuition in exchange for two years of service.
Seekerof:
Seems many of you, like ECK, BT, MrMulder, etc., are steadily and repeatedly forgetting House and Senate HR163 and Senate S89 bills that are backed and sponsored by virtually every Democrat.
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
What questions have you asked relevant to the issue that hasn't been answered?
Originally posted by Seekerof
Are you denying that Mr. Kerry doesn't have a draft agenda, yet you will claim and assert that Bush does? Huh?!
Where will Kerry get the manpower for the creation of those so-called added divisions ECK? You re-uping? Thought not? So he drawing them from what available pools of manpower, cause if Kerry can find those "pools", then I'm sure Bush can find them too, eh?
All-in-all, this DRAFT crap is exactly that, bullcrap, and with what little proofs you have brought forth from the likes of truthout.com or org, or whatever, seems that there is sufficient evidences to say, prove, and argue to the contrary, huh?
Question?
Will Kerry, if elected, treat Iraq as another Vietnam? Think about it before you answer.
Originally posted by Seekerof
ECK, your listing of who served and with what party affiliation is quite entertaining.
Question: You post the list of those Democrats that served to show and give justifiable reason that the Democrats should or will bring back the draft?
Enlighten us, k, cause I'm a diehard war-hawk Republican and I served...your point again?