posted on Mar, 29 2011 @ 11:14 AM
So, they admitted something is wrong. Then it was under control. Now, there is radiation in the sea water and, contrary to the nothing they are saying
on the MSM, there are meltdowns that are out of control.
Why is the US not there helping? We go into country after country to ensure democracy so how about we invade to ensure the rest of the world not bieng
affected by this disaster. Even the French got into Libya so we did not have to look the aggressor.
I don't care about dictators in the middle east that kill our soldiers as soon as we save them. Afghanistan, Iraq and NOW Libya. None of those guys
have missiles that can hit the US so who cares. Sell them arms and make our country rich and we can rebuild. We do that now but this way our kids
I do care about the sea life and the LONG term effects of this disaster of proportions that we have not seen. I do care about the next 4 generations
of children that are born to ANYONE who was near this accident or, in the long run, ate or drank the water. We will never know how many will die from
What is wrong with this thinking? In the words of our own president...
To brush aside America's responsibility as a leader and — more profoundly — our responsibilities to our fellow human beings under such
circumstances would have been a betrayal of who we are," Obama said. "Some nations may be able to turn a blind eye to atrocities in other countries.
The United States of America is different. And as president, I refused to wait for the images of slaughter and mass graves before taking action."
The mass graves are there as well as a over 30k dead or missing...when do we invade?
edit on 29-3-2011 by esdad71 because: start
edit on 29-3-2011 by esdad71 because: validate idea