It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
A rare particle containing equal parts weird antimatter and normal matter has popped up in experiments at the world's largest particle accelerator.
Scientists recently observed new behavior of this particle, called a B meson, at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) atom smasher, a 17-mile long (27-km) underground ring at the CERN laboratory near Geneva. B mesons are made up of one quark (the building block of protons and neutrons) and one anti-quark, which is the antimatter partner to the quark. [The Strangest Little Things in Nature]
All normal particles are thought to have antimatter partn
Originally posted by semperfortis
The more we learn, the more we realize how little we know..
This is amazing not only in the facts, but also in the potential for science to learn so much about our world and how it really operates..
Anti-Matter!!!!
Dark Matter!!!!
What is next?
So maybe Star Trek was not so far off...
www.livescience.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
Originally posted by DOADOA
hmmmm how do we know people aren't just making up a ship load of crap? i mean, they can say they've just discovered atoms that looks like a gnome in a galaxy far far away and we'd just be like "OMG that is amazing!!"
In this case, the B mesons decayed by a different process, and created different end products, than previous research has measured. That was partly enabled by the increased energy of the collisions at LHC compared with other atom smashers; the more energy, the more particles are produced, and the more particles, the greater the chances of finding rare events like these, Stone said.
Originally posted by ltinycdancerg
reply to post by BlackPoison94
thanks for crushing my dreams
JK! *wink wink nudge nudge*
I was being jovial in that post- however, you've brought up something...
WHY does this theoretical particle HAVE to be a boson?
***just a little BG on myself- I got my Bach of Sci in Psychology/Pre-Med with a Minor in Philosophy (Concentration on Phil of Science and Phil of Religion);
And though I do not have the slightest clue about the mathematics involved in quantum physics,
(took 3 semesters of CALC in college- that was plenty lol)
I do have a solid science foundation, as well as theoretical physics/philosophy...
I also had the privilege of being nominated and assigned to a research team in College -Clemson University- funded by NASA to conduct research on societal development in space/on mars. Not from the scientific aspect, but from social/psychological/philosophical/spiritual/religious.
It was called "The Terrestrial Lifeboat Project"
I was part of the original team.
....hmm....maybe I should create a thread on this- with everything that's going on....our task (over several years- I was part of the team for a little under 2 years- my Jr and Sr year in college) I still have all my research/doc's from it packed in storage...
---- sharing my educational BG so that y'all have an idea of where I am educationally/intellectually regarding this issue- I know more than average, but am not an expert. I'm also a total nerd- despite my appearance lol -----edit on 29-3-2011 by ltinycdancerg because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by tonypazzohome
anyone else think meson =mason. one negative one positive combined in one= duality/good evil -
Originally posted by BlackPoison94
reply to post by ltinycdancerg
Why does it have to be a boson?