It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Orbital Information vs. Significant Earthquakes

page: 1
1

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 28 2011 @ 08:22 PM
link   
I have found information that I will need fellow ATSer's to help me correlate the orbital information to significant earthquakes to see if there is indeed a way to predict earthquakes by watching the orbits of comets and asteroids that correspond with earth alignment.... All posts and replies welcome... Just trying to get some help with this research....

Here is the orbital diagrams
neo.jpl.nasa.gov...

Here is the significant earthquake records by year
earthquake.usgs.gov...

If we can connect the dots on this then maybe we can figure out what is happening to our earth and better prepare for future events that can be detrimental to our existence....



posted on Mar, 28 2011 @ 09:17 PM
link   
looking at the list of NOE's i selected apophis as my first subject, as it was one of the few i recognized (as a worthy subject).

Sept. 21st 2009 Apophis/Sun/Earth

Sept. 21st 2009 6.1M Bhutan

Only took about 5 minutes to find this, gonna keep looking but im not gonna make a post for each one i find, i will try to make a nice list to see what happens.

On another note, i am curious if there is a way to correlate with this the position of the earths rotation during such events?

ps, thanks alot...now im gonna be up all night watching circles and dots

edit on 28-3-2011 by RadicalRebel because: (no reason given)

Also another note the USGS info doesnt go back past 2002 as accurately as the records for anything since then
edit on 28-3-2011 by RadicalRebel because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 28 2011 @ 09:22 PM
link   
reply to post by RadicalRebel
 


Here is a reference to help you decide the size of the object if it is an asteroid...
neo.jpl.nasa.gov...

I did find a correlation with the myanmar earthquake and started a thread on that to see if someone might want to help... here is that thread...
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Thanks for your help with this.... I hope we can find some correlation...



posted on Mar, 28 2011 @ 09:27 PM
link   
Major earthquakes are not caused by celestial objects. This is well established and if you want I can get a ton of sources on that.


If they were, the Moon should be absolutely ripping our planet apart!

edit on 28/3/11 by shadowland8 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 28 2011 @ 10:17 PM
link   
This thread is using the same facts that i am so there seems to be something to this... just trying to figure some stuff out... the moon does not come from across the system, it rotates with us...... but some of these small bodies have a much larger orbit which would give them a higher relative speed so that when they do come close enough it could have significant impact.... same principle as used here....

www.abovetopsecret.com...

I have just found more data to correlate the information to...



posted on Mar, 29 2011 @ 12:00 AM
link   
here is what i have found from the first three on that list, it is interesting that the coincidence for each seems to effect certain areas more than others (probably an random anomoly but still interesting).

I also have not been recording instances of EQ's smaller than 5.0M and some notes have been added for additional info such as crossing the ecliptic or additional bodies included in the alignment.
and here is the link again for the list of recorded earthquakes

(6344 p-l)
Feb 14 2008 6.9M greece
Nov. 14th 2007 7.7M Chile
Sept 25 2003 (crossed ecliptic) 8.3 Japan
Jan 22 2003 (crossed ecliptic) 7.6 Mexico (offshore)

(2001 eo51)
May 16th 2010 5.8 Puerto Rico
Oct 24 2009 6.9 Banda sea Indonesia
Oct 24 2007 6.8 INDONESIA (alignment includes mercury)
Oct 19 2005 6.4 Honshu Japan
March 28 2005 8.6 NORTHERN SUMATRA, INDONESIA (near alignment includes venus and mercury)(crossing ecliptic)
Dec 6 2004 6.8 Japan
May 3 2004 6.6 Chile
May 1 2003 6.4 Turkey

(2011 EM51)
Nov 24 2008 Russia (alignment includes mercury)
Dec 5 2005 6.8 Congo/Tanzanai
June 10 2004 6.9 Russia (alignment includes venus)

Its late and im tired but assure i will be adding more info in the morning.



posted on Mar, 30 2011 @ 12:25 PM
link   
here is some more info i have been able to find in my spare time.

1566 Icarus (1949 MA) (all near ecliptic)
Nov 3 2010 5.3 Serbia (possible venus influence)
Dec 30 2009 5.9 Mexico (possible venus/mercury influence)
Oct 4 2009 6.6 PHILIPPINES
Aug 18 2008 (no reported earthquakes)
May 16 2006 7.4 Kermadec Islands
Jan 10 2003 6.7 Papua New Guinea

1620 Geographos (1951 RA)
Feb 23 2008 6.8 Visokoi Island, South Sandwich Islands (possibly feb 25 7.2 Indonesia)(near ecliptic)

1862 Apollo (1932 HA)
Nov 27 2005 6.4 Iran
Oct 19 2005 6.4 Japan (near ecliptic)
March 3 2002 7.4 AFGHANISTAN

2340 Hathor (1976 UA)
Oct 24 2007 6.8 Indonesia (near ecliptic)(near approach to earth)
March 28 2005 8.6 Indonesia (mercury venus)
Aug 15 2003 5.4 california (USA)

(2011 EL51)
June 28 2007 6.7 Papua New Guinea (includes mercury)
Oct 27 2004 5.9 Romania (near ecliptic)
***Aug 21 2003 4.5 whyoming(USA)/5.9 Iran/7.2 New Zealand(possible mars/venus/Jupiter inclusion)

(2011 EJ47)
feb 21 2011 6.3 CHRISTCHURCH, NEW ZEALAND (non alignment/near approach @ ecliptic)
---earthquake-report.com...
Sept 3 2010 7.0 New Zealand (non alignment/ near ecliptic)

3200 Phaethon (1983 TB)
dec 26 2010 7.7 indonesia (non align/near ecliptic)

the above 2 posts are from 20 NOEs of about 1200 so i have decided to eliminate some objects due to thier size (or lack of) All info that i post from now on will include est. diameter given by nasa unless none is given. Any object which does not have an indicated diameter will be included.
edit on 30-3-2011 by RadicalRebel because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
1

log in

join