It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by apacheman
I think there should be screening for it, and forced removal from areas of responsibility: they CANNOT be trusted, by their very nature, literally. No sociopath should be allowed to run for office or run a corporation, any more than a sexual predator should be allowed to run a daycare.
Originally posted by the.lights
Originally posted by apacheman
I think there should be screening for it, and forced removal from areas of responsibility: they CANNOT be trusted, by their very nature, literally. No sociopath should be allowed to run for office or run a corporation, any more than a sexual predator should be allowed to run a daycare.
This hit the nail on the head. I have been championing the argument for psychopathic screening for some time, to anyone who would listen.
These individuals should not be given the chance to gain control of military, governmental or corporation positions of power. We are all, collectively, at greater risk because of it.
Originally posted by DogsDogsDogs
If you suspect you're involved with one of these people, RUN! because you really are running for your very life (whether they might literally kill you or not).
Originally posted by Illusionsaregrander
reply to post by unityemissions
You actually are not wrong, as long as there is inter group competition, (ie, unless and until humanity does begin acting in a "one species" or "one world" mindset,) groups with sociopathic leaders will have a competitive advantage. But only under certain circumstances.
At this point though, we have long passed the threshold where the advantage is actual. In other words we think we are gaining advantage, in the short run, but our actions in fact are extremely disadvantagous to us in the long run.
Originally posted by unityemissions
reply to post by Illusionsaregrander
Well were just going to have to agree to disagree.
I think it would be more intellectually honest if you stated, in your opinion, rather than stating these as facts.
Your reasoning is incomplete, because you fail to see the advantages of forced collapse, or suffering in the first place. It's a eugenic process. Without it, we retard. Sometimes ya gotta take a giant leap back to progress!
Game theory can suck it. Scientists can hardly predict what the wether will be like over the next few days with a high degree of accuracy. No way they're using enough variables in the equation.
Originally posted by sepermeru
reply to post by mr-lizard
I did not compare them at all. In fact, I specifically pointed out how different they are to someone who did. So either you're confusing posters, or you should probably not expect your own contribution to be taken very seriously when it's clear you're not paying attention.