It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by heineken
reply to post by NyxOne
i can see you are a new member here...you have to back up your posts with sources..links???
we dont take your word as God's Law here sry
Originally posted by heineken the point of this thread is.. that NASA's main debunking statement is that AMATEUR ASTRONOMERS WOULD HAVE ALREADY DING DONG THE BELLS and i have my doubts that amateur astronomer can not be able to see it yet
Originally posted by heineken
you cant contradict me here
Venus is very faint and difficult to locate with a telescope during daytime...;
Originally posted by NyxOne
Originally posted by heineken
reply to post by NyxOne
i can see you are a new member here...you have to back up your posts with sources..links???
we dont take your word as God's Law here sry
...I have to back up a basic fact with links?
Is the level of intelligence that low on this forum?
It was very faint and difficult
although it can be difficult
Originally posted by heineken
Originally posted by NyxOne
Originally posted by heineken
reply to post by NyxOne
i can see you are a new member here...you have to back up your posts with sources..links???
we dont take your word as God's Law here sry
...I have to back up a basic fact with links?
Is the level of intelligence that low on this forum?
yes you have to sry
Originally posted by ManBehindTheMask
And like another person posted, and like i have before, anything of that size would have either destroyed our solar system or the two stars would have been sucked into each other by now, just because of sheer magnetic pull.........either way same end result.......
No im not with NASA , im not even an astronomer........im just a guy with some common sense and a little critical thinking skills