posted on Mar, 27 2011 @ 10:35 PM
While there is a lot of interesting info provided in this 3 year old video, one must remember that just because a soldier says something, it doesn't
make it so. My gripe is with the bearded guy, presumably ex-soldier or Marine, who says that he was given orders to kill everyone in a crowd if even
one shot was made. Well quite frankly that's BS. I know its BS because such an order would be a war crime, and in today's climate I can not imagine
any officer or NCO giving such an order. And if someone did give such an order, the troops know well enough that to follow such an order would also be
a war crime. My guess is the guy is saying that because he wants to embellish his anti-war point of view. Which point of view I am not against.
The ways things really work is that if a US patrol were to encounter fire from someone in a crowd, the first thing we are taught is to return fire,
and manuver either towards the ambush or out of the fire-trap. Let us consider here, the worst case scenario, where a US convoy is fired on from a
crowded market area. Those soldiers not immediatey identifying the sources of fire, would return fire in the direction of where they thought it had
come from, and if that area was in a major civilian crowd, should fire in the air, above the head of the crowd. A person's natural relfex is to
either duck or jump to the ground. Anyone not doing exactly that, puts themselves as very risk of being shot, particularly if they had anything that
looked like a weapon in their hands. Do innocent persons get killed like this? Sometimes, and that is a tragic loss. However, put the blame on where
it properly lay, which is on the cowardly attacker who risks his fellow muslim's lives by hiding in a crowd, and not on the US troops reacting to an
attack.
Let us all remember that war is a terrible thing among humans; indeed, it should be the most terrible and horrific. And in this regard, the US has
rather shown awesome restraint in its use of military power in pursuing the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. I know that seems hard for some to fathom
when we hear of a dozen or two civilian casualties. Yes, that's very sad, but what would be sadder is to read of tens of thousands of civilian
casualties on a recurring basis. And that is exactly what the US has the POWER to do, if it wasn't so concerned with avoiding as much harm to
civilians as possible. People doubting this need to read their history, where in a war not so long ago, the US would inflict tens of thousands
civilian casualties in a day in their bombings of Germany and Japan. Or cause hundreds in their bombings and artillery fires in Vietnam. And compared
with other modern wars, the US has not conducted any ethnic cleansing of Iraqi or Afghani villages, even in retribution for heinous ambushes of US
soldiers.
I don't agree with the political decisions to either invade Iraq or continue the war in Afghanistan, but having been a soldier myself, I have great
sympathy for those over there then and now. And despite what a few pissed-off ex soldiers say, or some bad behaving persons that happen to be soldiers
have done, the story from Iraq and Afghanistan is one of remarkable HONOR in the behavior of the vast majority of US (and its allied) military has
behaved in these wars. The fact that we can discuss this on this forum - despite the great flaws in our political and social systems - is a
celebtration in the continued freedoms we all enjoy. There is much broken in the western democracies right now, however there is also much that works
right. So let's acknowledge that while we may not be doing well of late, that the basic model is correct, and that we as its moving parts simply need
to keep pressing for change.