The Sun is the star at the center of the Solar System. It is almost perfectly spherical and consists of hot plasma interwoven with magnetic fields.[12][13] It has a diameter of about 1,392,684 km,[5] about 109 times that of Earth, and its mass (about 2×1030 kilograms, 330,000 times that of Earth) accounts for about 99.86% of the total mass of the Solar System.[14] Chemically, about three quarters of the Sun's mass consists of hydrogen, while the rest is mostly helium. The remainder (1.69%, which nonetheless equals 5,628 times the mass of Earth) consists of heavier elements, including oxygen, carbon, neon and iron, among others.[15]

The Sun formed about 4.6 billion years ago from the gravitational collapse of a region within a large molecular cloud. Most of the matter gathered in the center, while the rest flattened into an orbiting disk that would become the Solar System. The central mass became increasingly hot and dense, eventually initiating thermonuclear fusion in its core. It is thought that almost all other stars form by this process. The Sun's stellar classification, based on spectral class, is G2V, and is informally designated as a yellow dwarf, because its visible radiation is most intense in the yellow-green portion of the spectrum and although its color is white, from the surface of the Earth it may appear yellow because of atmospheric scattering of blue light.[16] In the spectral class label, G2 indicates its surface temperature of approximately 5778 K (5505 °C), and V indicates that the Sun, like most stars, is a main-sequence star, and thus generates its energy by nuclear fusion of hydrogen nuclei into helium. In its core, the Sun fuses 620 million metric tons of hydrogen each second

Originally posted by Unity_99
reply to post by InTheFlesh1980

---

For the magical kingdom current model, you should skip ahead to 43 59 and see our current science depicted, and have a lollipop.

Originally posted by InTheFlesh1980

Originally posted by Unity_99
reply to post by InTheFlesh1980

---

For the magical kingdom current model, you should skip ahead to 43 59 and see our current science depicted, and have a lollipop.

If I have a lollipop that's too massive, won't it be too hot to eat?

Attention scientific world: we know that Einstein postulated that E=mc^2, that the totality of the energy of an object is directly proportional to its mass. However, upon further review, and overturning all rational knowledge of science throughout human history, this guy Unity_99 in a forum has changed our minds. Mass is now directly proportional to heat. Yes, the more massive it is the hotter it is.

Thanks for the laugh bud!

Star Formation." World Book Encyclopedia. So-Sz Volume18. Chicago: World Book1989: 849. "The kind of star that takes shape depends on the mass of the contracting cloud. A cloud with mass about 1/20 that of the sun becomes a red,low-luminosity main sequence star." 0.05 solar mass
Cohen, Martin. In Darkness born - The Story of a Star Formation.Cambridge University Press, 1988: 37. "Both theory and observations concur in defining a minimum protostellar mass for the ignition of the hydrogen fusion to be around 0.08 solar mass. (Jupiter and Saturn for comparison with this limit, are only 0.001 and 0.0003 solar masses)." 0.08 solar mass

43 39 ----In order to address controlled gravitation on the atomic level, we have to first take a look at the main stream model of the atom, in relation to reality.

So We're Going To Have Story Time!: The Magical Kingdom!

Using Basic Logi and Occam's razor, lets take a closer look at Quantum Mechanics. Keep It Simple! Occam's Razor means the simplest solution is often the best.

So here is mainstream sciences version of Occam's Razor:

There once was a magical kingdom, and this kingdom exploded into existence from nothing. The smallest parts of that kingdom they call atoms.

(read in comparison Dewey Larson's book: The Case Against the Nuclear Atom)

And they're made up of one sided coins, and one sided magnets called protons and electrons. With a no sided magnet called a neutron.

They say the proton is an all positive magnet. And an electron is a masseless magnet but it's all negative. But that positive magnet and that imaginary negative magnet don't go together.

Oh no no! This is a magical kingdom! And in this fantasy world positive and negative magnets orbit each other on a 2D flat plane.

Makes Sense So Far!

Now all these positive magnets named protons, are compacted together somehow even though two positive poles of a magnet will propell each other.

Now the electrons are little balls of negativity. But they aren't really there. Yet they orbit around those compacted positive magnets.

But wait, not really, because the little balls of negativity are more like a cloud of probability at the same time and those little guys pop in and out of existence.

That's the technical phrase for "we don't know what we're talking about"

Now that we have all that explained, lets move onto photons. Good old occam's razor explains it every time. The photon is another masseless particle. And that's the fastest moving thing in the universe.

But wait, there are other things called neutrino's that travel much faster. We'll just sweep those under the rug and call it the product of faulty wire.

Oh yeah, Tachyon's travel faster too, but they don't exist because the King said so.

Now, this sort of fastest moving, masseless particle, is also a wave. And it travels in perfectly straight lines like all ocean waves do. Because the ocean is flat of course.

The end.

That's all Folks!

And that's the magical story of Quantum Mechanics:

1) Ad Antiquitam
2) Ad hoc
3) Ad Novitam
4) Authoritarianism
5) Derision
6) Dismissal
7) Ignotum per ignotius
8) Mal entendu
9) Non sequitur
10) Pedantism
11) Post Hoc Ergo Prompter Hoc
12) Proton Pseudos
13) Reification
14) Tautology
15) Ultra-Symbolism
16) Unilateralism

And main stream science's Occam Razor. But don't worry there is a bunch of formula's and equasions to prove that theory.

--- Well I don't really see it that way and I know many others who share the same opinions.

phys.org...
Serious blow to dark matter theories? New study finds mysterious lack of dark matter in Sun's neighborhood

All things are in Motion.

All Motion is Polarized.

Which means all things in motion have a north and a south.

There is no such thing as a one sided ball or a singly charged particle. It's illusions of observation. Or misconsceptions.

www.physicsmyths.org.uk...
Physics Myths and Physics Facts
Flaws in Concepts and Theories of Modern Physics

I have my own view of the Adam, which is a little more simplistic. I say that cluster of protons is actually a bunch of bucky balls, or magnets compacted together.

phys.org...
Particles magnetically 'click' to form superstructures

Each of those little bucky balls in that cluster has a north and a south. But because the cluster has mass they're trying to call the entire cluster a proton.

If people are interested in an alternative, and different persepectives, I would strongly encourage looking into Dewy B. Larson: The Collected Works.

www.reciprocalsystem.com...
DEWEY B. LARSON: THE COLLECTED WORKS
...
Especially, The Case Against the Nuclear Atom, by Dewey B. Larson.

www.reciprocalsystem.com...

In which Dewy B. Larson eloquently addresses the misconceptions of the mainstrem model of the atom, and the history of those ad hoc misconceptions.


*******************************************************************************************************

---Here again we see Walter Russels depiction of the Atom and its Vortex nature.

In 1926, Walter Russell presented the Spiral Periodic Chart of the Elements in 2 formats, an arial view, and a side view, and sent those to hundreds of scientists. And also publishing the Universal One. He sent that to hundreds of scientists and universities as well.

With his publication of the periodic chart, he predicted the existence of Deuterium and Tritium as well as all the trans uranium elements such as plutonium and neptunium

www.arisdyne.com...

---By 1927 Walter Russell had transmuted water into 17 different substances at Westinghouse Laboratories.

An alchemaic action will reap what they lable a nuclear reaction which will be contained within its own field density! A field density is different than the (wall of a cell)

Here we see a picture comparison of John Keeley's (model of the atom, standard one),with the standard model of the proton and quarks with Dr. Pallathadka Keshava Bhat's model of the universe in a fractal form.

So I'm just wondering where Cavitation is accounted for in teh current atomic model?

www.livescience.com...

We see what happens when a propeller blade of a certain orientation spins in a medium. It creates cavitation bubbles in its wake.

So a cluser of magnets the size of what they would lable an atom, spinning really quickly, might generate cavitation bubbles in its wake.

phys.org...
Researchers engineer molecular magnets to act as long-lived qubits

So how are scientists supposed to discern the difference between a solid particle and a cavitation bubble on the atomic scale?

If they don't account for cavitation bubbles, they might make up a bunch of equations to describe the behavior of solid particles.

Bubble fusion, also known as sonofusion, is the non-technical name for a nuclear fusion reaction hypothesized to occur inside extraordinarily large collapsing gas bubbles created in a liquid during acoustic cavitation.[1] Rusi Taleyarkhan and collaborators claimed to have observed evidence of sonofusion in 2002. The claim was quickly surrounded by controversy, including allegations ranging from experimental error to academic fraud. Subsequent publications which followed, which claimed independent verification of sonofusion were also highly controversial. Taleyarkhan was found to have engaged in falsification of independent verification, and to have included people on his papers who weren't aware of it by an investigation by Purdue University. He was subsequently stripped of his professorship. One of his funders, the Office of Naval Research reviewed the report by Purdue, and deemed that the behaviour was "so severe as to merit debarment".[2]

A Sonolumiescent Bubble is the result of an alchamaic implosion. Not a standard explosion. So when scientists are measuring deuterium and tritium from a sonolumiescent implosion, they are trying to duplicate that by taking deterium and tritium and smashing it together in hopes that it will implode.

So they're using an explosive force hoping to create an implosion

CERN EPIC FAIL

Its absurd.

I. Theoretical Expose or Philosophical Analysis of Vibro-Molecular, Vibro-Atomic, and Sympathetic Vibro-etheric forces, as applied to induce Mechanical Rotation by Negative Sympathetic Attraction.
II. Explanatory Analysis of Vibro-Acoustic Mechanism in all its Different Groupings or Combinations to induce Propulsion and Attraction (sympathetically) by the Power of Sound-Force, as also the Different Conditions of Intensity, both Positive and Negative, on the Progressive Octaves to Ozonic Liberation and Luminosity.
III. The Determining Principle of Matter, or the Connective Link between the Finite and the Infinite, Progressively considered from the Crude Molecular to the Compound Inter-Etheric, showing the control of Spirit over Matter in all the Variations of Mass-Chords and Molecular groupings, both Physical and Mechanical.

(overunity seems to be related to sound wave)

www.svpvril.com...
Topic: John Keely's Laws of Harmony
Section: Law of Atomic Pitch

www.svpvril.com...
Topic: John Keely's Laws of Harmony
Section: Law of Pitch of Atomic Oscillation

Explode things and smash them together in hopes that they will implode within themselves!

Because they think everything was initiated from explosions. They're not looking at the other side of the coin.

www.svpvril.com...
Topic: John Keely's Laws of Harmony
Section: Law of Variation of Atomic Pitch by Temperature

www.svpvril.com...
Topic: John Keely's Laws of Harmony
Section: Law of Variation of Atomic Pitch by Electricity and Magnetism

www.svpvril.com...
Topic: John Keely's Laws of Harmony
Section: Law of Variation of Pitch of Atomic Oscillation by Pressure

A sonolumiescent bubble, the last stage of a cycle before it repeats again. Not the first!

---An imploding cavitation bubble does not compress to one point. The north pole of that bubble caves in on itself to form a hole or a ring like a donut.

JUST LIKE MARCO RODIN'S Models.

And very similar to what Professor John Searl says happens during his magnetization process with the imprinting of magnetic bubbles he calls it.


---Now some people lable this new science LENR or low energy nuclear reactions like the work of Andrea Rossi.

I just call it alchemy. He puts in nickel and hydrogen and comes out with copper. That's called transmutation. That's alchemy.

pesn.com...

We can make up new terms because we have stigma associated with these old words, but its alchemy.

example of microscoptic mixing... (from a picture)so two bucky balls

Last part:

But you can turn that magnet into a bunch of tinier magnets, individualized in a grid, at which point you can pass those two through each other and then you can reorganize/combine them so they are fused together in a new state.

And then we look at John Hutchinson's experiments with this butterknife in a solid block of metal and we see the cavitation damage resulting from that.

There is a lot more to these types of sciences!!!!

Imagine what we can do on the atomic level.

This is microscopic mixing (photo) Imagine atomic mixing. But its not atomic fusion in the same regard as science knows it currently.

Its a fusion resulting from cavitation!

So something other than electrons jumping valiance is going on here.

sites.google.com...

---In the top left we see a still image taken from youtuber magnetvortex's video. This is a paper clip sandwhiched between two neodymium magnets. Those magnets are in front of an old tv, we can see what they call the charge distribution, from the magnetic field lines.

The image on the top right is a nano-scopic microscopy costing billions of dollars in the course of many years. Claiming that for the first time scientists imaged the charge distribution

So by that logic and the picture comparison, we can say that two magnets are acting like a single molecule. And the evidence can be seen for less than 100 dollars on an old TV.

What happens on a micro, happens on a macro, and all scales in between!