It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Is our dear capitalist system actually making things worse?
Originally posted by wildtimes
And the plight of those of us who are forced to behave in a way we find unethical because some rich bast....bastion says so? I walked away from my last job as a low-level supervisor in a major Chicago-based, world-wide corporation because management was expecting me to behave unethically, and shut up about it. I refused to do it, and was taken behind closed doors and told:
"You don't have to agree with managements' orders, you just have to follow them, and appear supportive to management."
I said, "Well, no, I don't. I don't know how you sleep at night, but if this staffer suffers a health disaster because of your stupid policies and a 10th of a percent on your stupid 'budget' report, it's on YOU. I refuse to do it."
Originally posted by Illusionsaregrander
We did not see a banner year in terms of more people, but with India and China taking on the role of major consumers, they have more money, and they can demand a bigger share of the worlds resources. Like oil, like food, like other consumer goods.
[snip]
This was totally predictable. But no one wanted to listen. Just like no one wants to hear that if we do not get our population under control this is going to end very, very badly for us.
Originally posted by masqua
Somehow, I doubt that is going to work with the majority. For one thing, the various established religious structures of the world will strenuously resist allowing their congragations to switch to such Eastern mysticism.
Secondly, a father watching his wife and children starve is not going to be calmly sitting under a tree (like Buddha) and promoting inner tranquility. IMHO, of course.
Biofuels have forced global food prices up by 75% - far more than previously estimated - according to a confidential World Bank report obtained by the Guardian.
The damning unpublished assessment is based on the most detailed analysis of the crisis so far, carried out by an internationally-respected economist at global financial body.
The figure emphatically contradicts the US government's claims that plant-derived fuels contribute less than 3% to food-price rises. It will add to pressure on governments in Washington and across Europe, which have turned to plant-derived fuels to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases and reduce their dependence on imported oil.
rder 81 deals specifically with Plant Variety Protection (PVP) because it is designed to protect the commercial interests of corporate seed companies. Its aim is to force Iraqi farmers to plant so-called "protected" crop varieties 'defined as new, distinct uniform and stable’, and most likely genetically modified. This means Iraqi farmers will have one choice; to buy PVP registered seeds. Order 81 opens the way for patenting (ownership) of plant forms, and facilitates the introduction of genetically modified crops or organisms (GMOs) to Iraq. U.S. agricultural biotechnology corporations, such as Monsanto and Syngenta will be the beneficiaries. Iraqi farmers will be forced to buy their seeds from these corporations. GMOs will replace the old tradition of breeding closely related plants, and replace them with organisms composed of DNA from an altogether different species, e.g., bacterium genes into corn. In the long run, there won’t be a big enough gene pool for genetic viability.
Originally posted by masqua
Yes, we do... but as a community, not individually. Cities need to be surrounded by their own food source much like the notion of a 100 mile diet. Imports from distant countries, while loading the grocery stores of the west, are diverted away from those 2nd and 3rd world countries which can't afford the shipping costs. This goes on at our ultimate peril for obvious reasons.