It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Why would they do that? The government is making too much money.
Originally posted by 0001391
Originally posted by legalizeit
its about time someone had the ballz to get rid of cigarettes ... the things that are PROVEN to kill ...
Maybe now cannibas will have a fair chance to rise ..
So it's okay to take away other people's rights if it gives you a chance to get what you want?
Originally posted by MConnalley
i support this
Originally posted by MConnalley
i support this
Originally posted by James1982
Originally posted by Gixxer
Originally posted by legalizeit
its about time someone had the ballz to get rid of cigarettes ... the things that are PROVEN to kill ...
Maybe now cannibas will have a fair chance to rise ..
don't get confused this is not going to affect ciggerettes at all in anyway, this is about liquid nicotene that is use in electric cigerettes, tobaccos number one competition.
Wait I think I misread the bill because I thought it said Tobacco was going to be illegal... I'll have to go over it again.
If so, that sucks. E-Ciggs are way better for you than tobacco, and I've been wanting to get into them for awhile. I'd almost be more upset if it was just e-cigarette nicotine cartridges becoming illegal...
Originally posted by lcbjr1979
There is no way this will be pass and here is why. www.taxpolicycenter.org...
Even though this data is a few years old, the fact remains that the states can not afford to lose the tax revenue generated by tobacco. Every state is dealing with budget problems and not having enough money. Why would they institute a law that will have them lose even more money?
Originally posted by Vitchilo
Originally posted by phishyblankwaters
reply to post by Vitchilo
Well is this pure nicotine or are they talking cigarettes and anything with nicotine in them. Nicotine can kill you in high enough doses. It's still pretty crazy, but if they are talking about restricting pure nicotine (anti smoking aids, etc) it would be smart.
It's not pure nicotine. From the bill :
A person commits the crime of endangering the welfare of a minor if the person
knowingly:
[(d) Distributes, sells, or causes to be sold, tobacco in any form to a person under 18 years of age;
or]
[(e)] (d) Sells to a person under 18 years of age any device in which tobacco, marijuana, coc aine
or any controlled substance, as defined in ORS 475.005, is burned and the principal design and use
of which is directly or indirectly to deliver tobacco smoke, marijuana smoke, coc aine smoke or
smoke from any controlled substance into the human body including but not limited to:
(A) Pipes, water pipes, hookahs, wooden pipes, carburetor pipes, electric pipes, air driven pipes,
corncob pipes, meerschaum pipes and ceramic pipes, with or without screens, permanent screens,
hashish heads or punctured metal bowls;
(B) Carburetion tubes and devices, including carburetion masks;
(C) Bongs;
(D) Chillums;
(E) Ice pipes or chillers;
(F) Cigarette rolling papers and rolling machines; and
(G) Cocaine free basing kits.
Yeah it's about engendering minors, but it's still talks about cigarettes and tobacco.
This is effectively against cigarettes and the whole nicotine industry.