Originally posted by Aeons
Yes, you have indeed in other threads degraded women for being out of the traditional place of women and ruining everything.
And again, you are not all men. I don't hate all men. I don't even hate most men. I do however find certain men quite contemptible, and you
certainly seem to run around acting like one of those ones.
You noticing that I don't find guys like you worthy isn't something you can blow up to include all men. You aren't a representative of men, you
aren't a statistical sampling of men. I'll admit that you probably pick up on the fact that I might find that I am superior to YOU, but that is
purely a personal reaction to your posts.
I am all the things that you think a woman should be - and you hate the crap out of me for it. Its really quite amusing.
Yawn, please list all the post's where I expressly supported and advocated for traditionalism. Pretty pretty please? Wait you can't? aww pity you.
I hate the social construct of "woman" or rather what society enables women to do to men. I also hate the bias and discrimination against males in
our society(in favor of women). Make no mistake I view women first and foremost as human beings and I am not going to hold anyone to a lesser standard
because of their gender.
You don't see me saying "those barbarian's in Saudi Arabia have the right idea"(I wouldn't wish that fate on anyone). But if refusing to treat women
like perpetual children makes me a bigot, then sign me right up. Because that I think is the singular, most contemptible sin that our forefathers
committed against women.
We live in a society that enables women to commit great evil and get away with it. Of course it is a combination effect(arse backwards mix of
traditionalism's "women can do no harm"+ gender feminist's "women are the master gender"). From a male perspective it doesn't matter that not all
women are like that, what matters is that all women could be like that with the full blessing of the state.
But let's play a game, call it a term of the day type thing. Look up "feminist jurisprudence", and how "truly egalitarian" it is...(P.S to those who
missed the sarcasm, it isn't).
Heck look up Paternity Fraud while your at it.
(As per my slouch comment, that applies in a gender neutral function. If I married some chick that had a super paying job and I became the SAHP, I
would have to do something else. Volunteer work, something, even part time book-keeping. The most concession I would make about alimony is require the
breadwinner to pay for the SAHP's unemployment tax so in the advent of divorce separation, they could use that until they get back on their feet.
Direct payments from the bread winner strikes me as something akin to slavery or peonage, something I can never accept or agree with ever for any
edit on 28-3-2011 by korathin because: added:"," , removed "the" "( ending paraghraph text to alleviate missunderstandings)