posted on Mar, 25 2011 @ 10:49 PM
Originally posted by Tecumte
I have to offer just my opinion on this, that the reason we are seeing so many pseudoscience 'studies' like this one and so much effort now being put
into trying to brainwash the herd that 'nothing is going on' is because actually SOMETHING IS going on as regards efforts to manipulate our skies amd
This study is pseudo science?? What sort of study qualifies as "real" science for you then?
Here's the authors of it:
Contrails to Cirrus—Morphology, Microphysics, and Radiative Properties
David Atlas - Laboratory for Atmospheres, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland
Zhien Wang* - Goddard Earth Science and Technology Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, and NASA Goddard Space Flight Center,
David P. Duda - National Institute of Aerospace, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia
The * next to Wang is because his current affiliation at hte time of publicatoin was different -
* Current affiliation: Department of Atmospheric
Sciences, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming
Looks pretty serious science to me - and there are an awful lot of papers out there similarly by people with lots of letters after their names on
atmospheric science that run counter to the chemtrail theory.
Personally if I was totalling up Bravo-Sierra "studies" to decide which side was trying to hide something I'd go no further than you tube....and that
would be me settled that chemtrails are busted!!
I'm really surprised someone who is impartial and cares about this and has the resources hasn't done the needed sampling already.
Anyone who is "impartial" probably doesn't see the need to bother.
And if someone like that did do a study and found no such thing as chemtrails hen they'd be denounced as a shill & a secret disinfo agent anyway.
As I said - there is only 1 "side" can do this and persuade anyone of any thing - the chemtrail believers.
edit on 25-3-2011 by Aloysius the
Gaul because: (no reason given)
edit on 25-3-2011 by Aloysius the Gaul because: (no reason given)