It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


If you support Gaddafi, you are supporting the biggest globalist of ALL... and have lost your mind.

page: 2
<< 1   >>

log in


posted on Mar, 24 2011 @ 11:41 AM
reply to post by boondock-saint

Whoa Boon! You can't pull out something like that and expect some of these people to understand that. They are still caught up in the Republican "patriot movement" that throws facts and common sense to the wind in favor of poilitcal power and war profiteering.

Just remember, if you side with Gaddafi in any way, you are not a true-blood patriot.

posted on Mar, 24 2011 @ 11:44 AM
in true actuality,
Gaddafi was doing us a favor
by eliminating the Al Queda forces
returning home from Iraq fighting
and killing Americans.

It's funny how your perspective changes
when you find out the truth.

posted on Mar, 24 2011 @ 11:50 AM

Originally posted by sheepslayer247
reply to post by boondock-saint

Whoa Boon! You can't pull out something like that and expect some of these people to understand that. They are still caught up in the Republican "patriot movement" that throws facts and common sense to the wind in favor of poilitcal power and war profiteering.

Just remember, if you side with Gaddafi in any way, you are not a true-blood patriot.

dude, I am not saying I support Gaddafi.
I do not. By the same token, I do not
support Al Queda either.

posted on Mar, 24 2011 @ 12:03 PM
We all know Gadaffi is a tyrant yet I for one think we should keep our noses out of other countries political problems.

I read today in the Independent Libyan expats are 'plotting terror revenge terror attacks here in the UK.


Supporters of Muammar Gaddafi may attempt to carry out a terrorist attack on UK soil in revenge for military action in Libya, senior government sources have warned.

The security services have told ministers that a number of conversations between British-based Libyans suggesting support for a revenge attack have been intercepted recently. The intelligence, which was passed to Nato allies, was recorded shortly before the start of the no-fly zone operation.


If this is true, and lets face it in this tangled web of lies and counter lies and a terrorist action is taken who is to blame, the terrorist or the government who interfered once again in another country's politics?

This is a genuine question as I really don't know the answer.

posted on Mar, 24 2011 @ 12:05 PM

Originally posted by dizzylizzy
I read today in the Independent Libyan expats are 'plotting terror revenge terror attacks here in the UK.

a false flag attack on the UK
or the US, is all it would need
to justify another country being

I am so %^&$%# sick of this ^&*&%$$^

posted on Mar, 24 2011 @ 12:10 PM
I dont support Gaddaffi, he's a tyrant, but lets not forget who has been propping this guy up for the past 30 years, now we plan to go in and put someone else in there using military action, changing one puppet for another who will agree good rates with the west on oil and we will call it democracy.

posted on Mar, 24 2011 @ 12:16 PM

Originally posted by woodwardjnr
now we plan to go in and put someone else in there using military action, changing one puppet for another who will agree good rates with the west on oil and we will call it democracy.

that's called Nation Building in the
name of the Rothschilds banking

posted on Mar, 24 2011 @ 12:22 PM
I think that much of what the OP interprets as "support" for Gaddafi, is not support for him at all. Rather lack of support for US (or, insert respective nation here...) involvement in the situation at all. Darfur isn't our business, why should this be any different?

I wish, even if it's just for a few years, that my country, the United States of America, would worry about the United States of America, and our problems. Our humanitarian crises. Our human rights violations. Our devastatingly corrupt "regime".

posted on Mar, 24 2011 @ 03:01 PM
And in Ghadaffi's words "Mind your own business." We wouldn't tolerate any other country in the US quashing our dissent. Why should they? We have enough problems here at home, without empire building elsewhere.

"Americans cannot escape a certain responsibility for what is done in our name around the world. In a democracy, even one as corrupted as ours, ultimate authority rests with the people. We empower the government with our votes, finance it with our taxes, bolster it with our silent acquiescence. If we are passive in the face of America's official actions overseas, we in effect endorse them." - Mark Hertzgaard

posted on Mar, 24 2011 @ 04:20 PM
Man, isn't it silly? You all are talking about a dictator and Al-Queda. It's like watching CNN. At first you should study something about history there, about tribes and clans, about poverty / wealth rate, unbelievable social benefits of jamahiriya economy, find something about artificial river and water supply. And Gaddafi's stands against imperialism and radical islamists. Africa needs panafricanism. Globalists don't.
Lo, today's news - guess what - these are already dealing oil with rebels. It's like hyenas guzzeling a zebra whiich isn't dead yet.

posted on Mar, 24 2011 @ 04:28 PM
reply to post by FalselyFlagged

next TCOTBIP and their MSM mouthpieces will tell us that gadaffi had his soldiers?/mercenaries? take babies out of incubators and ate them. Nurse_Nayirah

i've been sharing the following links on all the Libya related threads 'cause a lot of people have been drinking the kool-aid on this one, sadly it's not getting through some heads as i see the same people posting the same old MSM pro usa crapspew. perhaps they just post and don't keep reading the threads before, going on to the next Libya thread to post the same old crap

Obama asks Saudis to airlift weapons into Benghazi

Exclusive: Benghazi Explosion – Tactical Nuke Use By Gaddafi Suspected

Tactical BS more like it, it was the BS meter that actually exploded
, later shown to be the bombing of a local arms depot/cache

Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler The headline ought to read Tactical Nuke Use By Gaddafi Suspected by Donald Duck. The article seems to be making a case for that any explosion anywhere that either hurts or offends the sensibilities of Americans is a tactical nuke! The article also suggests the Oklahoma Bombing was a tactical nuclear device! Seems like yet another sensationalized accusation of the kind that gave us WMD in Iraq. Just a lot of unsubstantiated gibberish designed to enflame and anger people and get people here thinking about paying for another war for oil. How many times are the American people going to get fooled by the same old song and dance, wrap it in a flag, and have God bless it, and presto whamo American bombs start snuffing out 'collateral damage' everywhere.

Benghazi's importance to Libya and possibly the World:
also explains why Qaddafi has come down really harsh on these "rebels"

While many countries in the Middle East and North Africa bicker over water rights, Libya has tapped into an aquifer of 'fossil water' to change its topography – turning sand into soil. The 26-year, $20 billion project is nearly finished. …The Great Man-Made River, which is leader Muammar Qaddafi's ambitious answer to the country’s water problems, irrigates Libya’s large desert farms. The 2,333-mile network of pipes ferry water from four major underground aquifers in southern Libya to the northern population centers. Wells punctuate the water’s path, allowing farmers to utilize the water network in their fields. ... “Water is more precious for us than oil. ... Water here in Libya, it’s life.”

after all why would Qaddafi want to damage or destroy a 26-year, $20+ billion project that he considers his life's work?

Virtually unknown in the West: Libya's water resources. The real reason for toppling Quadaffi?

Libya: British plans to strip Gaddafi of oil revenue

Libya False Flag -part 1: Reuters Hoax EXPOSED
World Cheers as the CIA Plunges Libya Into Chaos

How was Libya doing under the rule of Gadaffi? How bad did the people have it? Were they oppressed as we now commonly accept as fact? Let us look at the facts for a moment.

Before the chaos erupted, Libya had a lower incarceration rate than the Czech republic. It ranked 61st. Libya had the lowest infant mortality rate of all of Africa. Libya had the highest life expectancy of all of Africa. Less than 5% of the population was undernourished. In response to the rising food prices around the world, the government of Libya abolished ALL taxes on food.People in Libya were rich. Libya had the highest gross domestic product (GDP) at purchasing power parity (PPP) per capita of all of Africa. The government took care to ensure that everyone in the country shared in the wealth. Libya had the highest Human Development Index of any country on the continent. The wealth was distributed equally. In Libya, a lower percentage of people lived below the poverty line than in the Netherlands.

How does Libya get so rich? The answer is oil. The country has a lot of oil, and does not allow foreign corporations to steal the resources while the population starves, unlike countries like Nigeria, a country that is basically run by Shell.

Like any country, Libya suffers from a government with corrupt bureaucrats that try to gain a bigger portion of the pie at the cost of everyone else. In response to this, Kadaffi called for the oil revenue to be distributed directly to the people, because in his opinion, the government was failing the people. However, unlike the article claims, Kadaffi is not the president of Libya. In fact he holds no official position in the government. This is the big mistake that people make. They claim that Kadaffi rules over Libya when in fact he doesn't, his position is more or less ceremonial. He should be compared to a founding father.

The true leader of Libya is an indirectly elected prime-minister. The current prime-minister is
Baghdadi Mahmudi. Calling Khadaffi the leader of Libya is comparable to calling Akihito the leader of Japan. Contrary to what your media is sketching, opinions in Libya vary. Some people support Gadaffi but want Mahmudi out. Others want both out. Many just want to live their life in peace. However, effort is taken to sketch the appearance of a popular revolt against the supposed leader of Libya, Gadaffi, when in fact he is just the architect of Libya's current political system, a mixture of pan-Arabism, socialism, and Islamic government.

Are the protesters in Libya comparable to the protesters in Egypt and Tunisia? Not at all. The governments reaction is more violent, and obviously excessive violence is being used. However let us look for a moment at the actions of the protesters. The building of the the general people's congress, the parliament of Libya, was put on fire by angry protestors. This is comparable to protesters putting the United States Capitol on fire. Do you think that for even a moment the US government would sit idly by as protesters put the US capitol on fire?

Great Britain funded an Al Qaeda cell in Libya, in an attempt to assassinate Gadaffi. The main opposition group in Libya now is the National Front for the Salvation of Libya. This opposition group is being funded by Saudi Arabia, the CIA, and French Intelligence. This group unified itself with other opposition groups, to become the National Conference for the Libyan Opposition. It was this organization that called for the "Day of Rage" that plunged Libya into chaos on February 17 of this year.

It did this in Benghazi, a conservative city that has always been opposed to Gadaffi's rule. It should be noted that the National Front for the Salvation of Libya is well armed. In 1996 the group tried to unleash a revolution in the eastern part of Libya before. It used the Libyan National Army, the armed division of the NFSL to begin this failed uprising.

Why is the United States so opposed to Gadaffi? He is the main threat to US hegemony in Africa, because he attempts to unite the continent against the United States. This concept is called the United States of Africa. In fact, Gadaffi holds all sorts of ideas that are contrary to US interests. The man blames the United States government for the creation of HIV. He claims that Israel is behind the assasination of Martin Luther King and president John. F. Kennedy. He says that the 9/11 hijackers were trained in the US. He also urged Libyans to donate blood to Americans after 9/11. Khadaffi is also the last of a generation of moderate socialist pan-Arab revolutionaries that is still in power, after Nasser and Hussein have been eliminated, and Syria has aligned itself with Iran.The United States and Israel however have no interest in a strong Arab world. In fact it seems that elementary to the plan is bringing Libya to its knees through chaos and anarchy. In late 2010, the United Kingdom was still propping up the Libyan government through lucrative arms sales. Nothing is a better guarantee to destroy Libya than a bloody civil war. The tribal system that is still strong in Libya is useful to exploit to generate such a war since Libya has historically been divided into various tribal groups.

This is also why the Libyan government responds by importing mercenaries. Tribal allegiances go before allegiance to the government, especially in Benghazi, and thus the central government has no control over the eastern part of the country anymore. The alternative to mercenaries is a conflict between the various ethnic groups. Gadaffi has tried for 41 years to make the country more homogeneous, but opposition groups funded by outside forced will take little more than a few days to put the country back into the 19th century, before the region was conquered and unified by Europeans. The violence is indeed excessive, but everyone seems to forget that the situation is not the same as in Tunis and Egypt. Tribal ties play a far greater role, and thus the conflict will unfortunately be bloodier.

Gadhaffi funded Sarkozy's French Presidential Campaign??

Kissinger plan to transform North Africa and Middle East into Turkmenistan

PROPAGANDA is a weapon of war and not just political control, people, and many seem to be the losers on these Libya threads.

not to mention the bots,dupes and disinfo-spreaders both conscious and unconscious, and those who want to show everybody that they "know" when all their doing is repeating something they were told.

the last thing the West wants is a United Africa, no more cheap or nearly free resources and no more toxic waste dump[Somalia] and no more bio-warfare testing on the continent of the greatest human genetic variability if that should happen. TCOTBIP having planning to commit genocide in Africa for a very long time
the last link is from 1974.

posted on Mar, 24 2011 @ 04:44 PM

Originally posted by FalselyFlagged

Originally posted by filosophia
I whole heartedly support Gaddafi, because

Too bad you didn't address any of the points in my original post.

You are supporting a brutal freedom-hating dictator that keeps his people down through violence and torture.

Please explain to me why exactly its good to have a police state that tortures/murders people for political dissent.

The GOP & DNC have slaughtered more innocent people, lied more wars into being and exported more violence.. on top of eroding the rights of "freedom lovers"

If the killing of innocent people is all that matters.. supporting the 2 party nut house is more insane.

How would the US Federal govt treat armed "rebels" on US soil??.. offer them tea & crumpets? and how come Iraqis & Afghanis fighting for freedom from the Federal reserve & GOPDNC aren't "rebels"??.. wouldn't an international NFZ enforced against the US save more lives?

Deriding gadaffi for killing people in light of what the GOP & DNC have done is transparent rank "do as we say, not as we do" hypocrisy.. the US govt has zero business lecturing anyone about killing rebels.

posted on Mar, 24 2011 @ 05:09 PM

Originally posted by FalselyFlagged
I find it utterly insane that many freedom-loving patriots around the world (including the infamous Alex Jones) have decided to side with a self-appointed meglomaniacal, brutally iron-fisted, autocratic despot over an authentic grassroots uprising of (mostly) freedom-loving people to take back their country from the clutches or tyranny. Yeah, I know that many people are naive enough to believe that the CIA can flip on a "revolution switch" and just cause whole countries to revolt whenever they feel like it, and while it might be truth that the CIA does have some influence over such matters, reality does not support this assertion or else Gaddafi would have been ousted by revolution long ago -- but this is beside the point.

This is not an authentic grassroots uprising. Ordinary civiliars do not have RPGs, machine guns, tanks, and helicopters.

posted on Mar, 24 2011 @ 08:20 PM
reply to post by boondock-saint

I know Boon. I was trying to be humorous, and I agreed with you. No sweat.

new topics

top topics

<< 1   >>

log in