It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by subject x
Originally posted by OptimisticPessimist
Imagine if you would, a hypothetical - that HAARP is a weapon with as much potential as the conspirators believe...don't worry, you're just playing along, you don't actually have to believe it.
Now, tell me - with such a potent, hypothetical weapon, what levels of security do you imagine would surround any "Facts" concerning it?
Judging from history, I'd imagine that they would have grabbed the first opportunity to use it very publicly to scare the rest of the world and to justify the money spent on it. Just like they did with the atomic bomb, the MOAB, the stealth fighter and bomber. They jumped on the first excuse show it all off to make sure everyone else was kept nervous about our military potential. I don't see why a weaponized HAARP would be any different. If the rest of the world new for a fact that the US could hit them with an earthquake at will, they'd be easier to keep "in line".
Originally posted by TheSparrowSings
Sure, this doesn't really explain WHY they would want to do this. I seriously don't know if its lack of foresight or blind stupidity on the scientists behind this project. But by using a high energy beam to "test" the ionosphere while we know that when the SUN does the same thing it can create some pretty dangerous results (sometimes). Plus, what makes them think they have the right to screw with something the entire world shares (the sky) without explaining their intentions fully and publicly. As well as disclosing their "results".
Depth The depth where the earthquake begins to rupture. This depth may be relative to mean sea-level or the average elevation of the seismic stations which provided arrival-time data for the earthquake location. The choice of reference depth is dependent on the method used to locate the earthquake. Sometimes when depth is poorly constrained by available seismic data, the location program will set the depth at a fixed value. For example, 33 km is often used as a default depth for earthquakes determined to be shallow, but whose depth is not satisfactorily determined by the data, whereas default depths of 5 or 10 km are often used in mid-continental areas and on mid-ocean ridges since earthquakes in these areas are usually shallower than 33 km.
Originally posted by MathiasAndrew
After the cold war ended this kind of show your might mentality doesn't fly in the face of global politics and the UN. The only time that a nation is able to flex it's muscle is during a war or "liberation"
The fact that they did not publicize the military purposes that this technology might be capable of only makes it that much more mysterious and frightful. I causes one to not just be afraid of the known realities but the possible ones too.
I think the simple comparison to an opera singer shattering a glass with their voice is a good example how frequecy from HAARP can be used to send a wave vibration strong enough to do many harmful and maybe some useful things to the planet
Originally posted by badw0lf
reply to post by kid_cudi
Man, you are like the evil clone of Jedi Miller.
What exactly did you expect to gain from making a thread quoting nothing but information that has been posted a hundred times on here, and saying "This is from their website"
You didn't put forward an argument for or against anything, until people come along to say "You know it's more than that right?" -- perhaps you didn't want to be the one to say it first....
Originally posted by ototheb85
I know nothing on this, but I have just looked at the haarp lay out and them towers are suppose to be the cause of all this? I dont understand how something so small can cause do whats been said.edit on 24-3-2011 by ototheb85 because: (no reason given)edit on 24-3-2011 by ototheb85 because: failed spelling