It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Phage
Any evidence other than "a friend said"?
62 rads per minute?
62 rads per hour?
62 rads per day?edit on 3/23/2011 by Phage because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Bedlam
You know about this sort of thing.
What sort of radiation can produce 1 rad per count?
Originally posted by n0tsan3
reply to post by bphi1908
no I'm saying there would be tons of death if you evacuated and ENTIRE STATE. Think about just evacuating LA by itself. Gridlock, people starving to death trapped on the highway with no fuel in their vehicle. It just seems like a bad idea to panic people because of something that might not actually be as bad as the death toll of a mass evacuation.
Originally posted by 5StarOracle
I believe lvls are indeed on the rise... Before Japan became a concern those readings were all below 10 on radnet.
Originally posted by JizzyMcButter
Awesome! Just in time for me to head back to Washington next week to get back to work.
I'm just going to work long enough to get together enough money and move back to Colorado permanently, it at least won't be as bad as the west coast is going to see this year.
Originally posted by 5StarOracle
reply to post by Bedlam
Also it may intrest some to know that radiation lvls being greater at higher elevations to be an indication of radiation carried by a jetstream. I also made no attempt to state what if any effect this would have. So just what are you trying to say?
I believe these lvls if indeed natural would fluctuate and not on a steady rise. The readings would not be as widespread or follow the weather patterns associated with the jetstream like these readings do.